Simpson v. Vantage Hospitality Group, Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER STRIKING 31 Response ( Non Motion ) filed by Vantage Hospitality Group, Inc. AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 12/14/2012 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 12/7/2012. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/30/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
LATROYA SIMPSON, individually and on
behalf of a class of similarly-situated
individuals,
8
9
Case No.: 12-cv-04814-YGR
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE
TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF RECENT
AUTHORITY AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiffs,
vs.
10
VANTAGE HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC.,
11
Defendant.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
Defendant Vantage Hospitality Group, Inc. has filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Notice of Recent
15
Authority. (Dkt. No. 31.) On November 21, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Statement of Recent Decision in
16
Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Strike Class
17
Allegations. (Dkt. No. 29.) Plaintiff’s Statement of Recent Decision attached two judicial opinions
18
published after the date of Plaintiff’s opposition, and the Statement itself contained no argument. As
19
such, this filing was permitted by Civ. L.R. 7-3(d)(2).
20
Defendant, on the other hand, has violated Civ. L.R. 7-3(d), which explicitly states that
21
“[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court
22
approval.” A response to a statement of recent decision is not permitted under this Local Rule.
23
Defendant has also circumvented the page limits set forth in Civ. L.R. 7-2 and 7-3 and given itself an
24
additional six pages of pure argument that is otherwise prohibited. Defendant’s Response at Dkt. No.
25
31 is hereby STRICKEN. The Court will not consider Defendant’s new arguments in rendering its
26
decision.
27
28
Defendant’s counsel, Randall Sunshine, Angela Agrusa, and David Farkas, are hereby
ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why they should not be sanctioned for failure to follow these explicit
1
Local Rules. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause shall be held on Friday, December 14, 2012, on
2
the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in a
3
courtroom to be designated. Defendant’s counsel must file a written response to this Order to Show
4
Cause no later than December 7, 2012 explaining counsel’s failure to comply with the above rules, as
5
well as certifying that each counsel has personally read and understands the Civil Local Rules
6
regarding Motion Practice. Defendant’s counsel is required to appear personally at the hearing. If the
7
Court is satisfied with Defendant’s counsel’s response and certifications, it will consider taking the
8
Order to Show Cause hearing off calendar.
9
10
The Clerk shall strike Dkt. No. 31 from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
Dated: November 30, 2012
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?