Karim v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 151

ORDER re stay pending appeal. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/7/2016. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA

6
7

NAD KARIM
M,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 12-cv-5240
0-PJH
Plaintiff,

8
v.

ORDER R STAY P
RE
PENDING A
APPEAL

HEWLETT-P
PACKARD COMPANY
Y,
Defendant.

12
13
14

On April 7, 2016, the parties filed their jjoint case m
managemen statemen in
nt
nt,

15

anticipation of the case manageme conferen set for A
m
ent
nce
April 14, 20
016. In the statement,
,

16

the parties no that the Ninth Circu has gran
e
ote
uit
nted defend
dant’s motio for an int
on
terlocutory

17

appeal. The statement further explains that de
s
f
efendant in
ntends to re
equest a sta pending
ay,

18

the appeal, at the case management conferen
e
t
m
nce, and tha plaintiff is not expec
at
s
cted to

19

oppose the re
equest. See Dkt. 150 at 3.
e

20

If both parties agr that the case shou be staye pending appeal, the case
ree
e
uld
ed
e

21

ma
anagement conference will be vacated if the parties submit a stipu
e
e
ulation rega
arding a

22

sta on or bef
ay
fore April 13, 2016. If no such st
1
f
tipulation is filed, the c
s
case manag
gement

23

conference will go forwa as sched
w
ard
duled.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: April 7, 2016
7
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge