Solyndra, LLC v. Suntech Power Holdings Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER re 33 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave from Rule 26(f) filed by Trina Solar Limited, Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc, Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limite d, Suntech America, Inc., Suntech Power Holdings Co., Ltd., Solyndra, LLC, Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Reset Deadlines as to 25 MOTION for Discovery re Leave From Rule 26(f) to Serve a Single Document Request. Responses due by 1/ 9/2013. Replies due by 1/16/2013. Motion Hearing set for 1/29/2013 04:00 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 12/27/2012. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JAMES KREISSMAN (SBN: 206740) jkreissman@stblaw.com 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 MATTHEW J. REILLY (moving for admission pro hac vice) matt.reilly@stblaw.com Counsel for Defendants Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. Ltd. and Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP JAMES DONATO (SBN: 146140) MIKAEL A. ABYE (SBN: 233458) jdonato@shearman.com mabye@shearman.com Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, CA 94111-5994 Telephone: (415) 616-1100 Facsimile: (415) 616-1199 Counsel for Defendants Suntech Power Holdings Co. Ltd. and Suntech America, Inc. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ELIOT A. ADELSON (SBN: 205284) eliot.adelson@kirkland.com 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Fax: (415) 439-1500 DANIEL E. LAYTIN (moving for admission pro hac vice) dlaytin@kirkland.com Counsel for Defendants Trina Solar Limited and Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 22 Solyndra LLC, Case No. CV-12-05272-SBA-EDL Plaintiff, 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE FROM RULE 26(f) ; ORDER AS MODIFIED v. Suntech Power Holdings Co., Ltd., Suntech America, Inc., Trina Solar Limited, Trina Solar Judge: (U.S.), Inc., Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Courtroom: Limited, Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Hearing Time: Hearing Time: Defendants. Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte E Not Set Not Set 28 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RULE 26(f) LEAVE Case No. CV-12-05272-SBA-EDL 1 2 WHEREAS, on December 19, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave from Rule 26(f) to Serve a Single Document Request (Dkt. No. 25); 3 4 WHEREAS, Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s motion is currently due January 2, 2013; 5 6 WHEREAS, due to the fact that the response period falls almost exclusively over the winter holiday vacation, Defendants require an additional week to prepare their joint opposition brief; 7 8 WHEREAS, the Parties, through their counsel, have discussed this matter and agreed to a one-week extension for Defendants to file their opposition brief; 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the Parties have only previously requested one time modification from the Court—an order implementing a stipulated briefing schedule and extending time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint (Dkt. No. 24); 12 13 14 15 NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE COURT’S APPROVAL, the Parties agree that Defendants shall have until January 9, 2013 to file their opposition brief to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave from Rule 26(f) to Serve a Single Document Request, and Plaintiff shall have until January 16, 2013 to file a reply brief. 16 17 Dated: December 26, 2012 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 18 By: 19 20 /s/ James Kreissman James Kreissman Matthew J. Reilly (moving for admission pro hac vice) 21 Attorneys for Defendants Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. Ltd. and Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. 22 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RULE 26(f) LEAVE Case No. CV-12-05272-SBA-EDL 1 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 2 3 By: /s/ James Donato James Donato 4 Mikael Abye 5 Attorneys for Defendants Suntech Power Holdings Co., Ltd. and Suntech America, Inc. 6 7 8 9 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 10 11 By: 12 /s/ Eliot A. Adelson Eliot A. Adelson Daniel E. Laytin (moving for admission pro hac vice) 13 14 Attorneys for Defendants Trina Solar Limited and Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc. 15 16 17 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 18 19 By: 20 /s/ William C. O’Neil William C. O’Neil 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 558-5600 21 22 23 Attorneys for Plaintiff Solyndra LLC 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RULE 26(f) LEAVE Case No. CV-12-05272-SBA-EDL 1 2 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING Pursuant to the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 45, Section X(B) 3 and Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 4 from Defendants’ counsel James Donato, Mikael Abye, Eliot A. Adelson, and Daniel E. Laytin and 5 Plaintiff’s counsel William C. O’Neil. 6 7 Dated: December 26, 2012 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 8 By: /s/ James Kreissman James Kreissman 9 10 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 11 12 Attorney for Defendants Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. Ltd. and Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. 13 14 15 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. A hearing on the motion is set for January 29, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. 19 S ER H 25 RT 24 26 Laporte R NIA D. lizabeth Judge E NO 23 DIFIE AS MO FO 22 _____________________________________ The Honorable ElizabethERED D. Laporte ORD Judge O United States Magistrate D IT IS S LI 21 UNIT ED December 27, Dated: _________ 2012 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RULE 26(f) LEAVE Case No. CV-12-05272-SBA-EDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?