Crosthwaite et al v. Sposeto Engineering, Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/15/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com 5 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 F. G. CROSTHWAITE, et al., as Trustees of the OPERATING ENGINEERS’ HEALTH 11 AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; AND ORDER RE SAME Plaintiffs, 12 13 Case No.: C12-5294 YGR v. 14 SPOSETO ENGINEERING, INC., a California corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs OPERATING 19 ENGINEERS’ HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al., voluntarily dismiss, without 20 prejudice, their claim against Defendant SPOSETO ENGINEERING, INC., a California 21 corporation. Defendant has neither served an answer nor moved for summary judgment, and 22 Plaintiffs have not previously filed or dismissed any similar action against Defendant. 23 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above- 24 entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge. 25 26 27 28 Executed this 8th day of January, 2013, at San Francisco, California. SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION /s/ By: Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 This case is dismissed without prejudice. 3 4 Date: January 15, 2013 5 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?