Om et al v. Melero et al
ORDER CONCERNING PLAINTIFFS RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/14/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KAMAJI OM, et al.,
No. C 12-5498 CW
OFFICER MELERO, et al.
On November 29, 2012, Defendants, Vickie Virk and several
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
employees of the City of Berkeley, moved to dismiss this action
for insufficient service, insufficient service of process, failure
to state a claim, and failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil
Plaintiffs, Kamaji Om, Krsnaya Om, and Sukia Tara
Aushadhalay, all proceeding pro se, failed to file a timely
response to the motion.
Civil L.R. 7-3(a).
All case-related mail
that has been sent to Plaintiffs since November 19, 2012 has been
returned as undeliverable.
Within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs shall
respond to Defendants’ motion.
Defendants shall reply seven days
after Plaintiffs’ response is filed.
Defendants’ motion will be
decided on the papers.
Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with this Order will result in
the dismissal of their claims against Defendants for failure to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?