Snyder v. Pliler

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/29/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 BRADLEY W. SNYDER, 7 Petitioner, No. C 12-5716 PJH (PR) 8 vs. ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 9 C.K. PLILER, Warden, Respondent. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 This habeas case was opened when petitioner filed a “‘Motion for Relief from Illegal 13 Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and (6)”. Petitioner seeks relief 14 regarding a closed habeas case, Snyder v. Martel, C 00-20620 RMW (PR), that was denied 15 in 2003. This court denied a certificate of appealability, as did the Ninth Circuit. Thus, this 16 is a second or successive petition. Petitioner cannot file a second or successive petition 17 until he obtains an order authorizing the filing from the Ninth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 18 2244(b)(3)(A). He has not done so. The court notes that petitioner filed another case 19 attacking this same conviction that was also denied as successive, No. C 10-2542 PJH. 20 Petitioner recently filed this same motion for reconsideration in that case that was also 21 denied. 22 The motion for leave to proceed IFP (docket # 5) is GRANTED. The petition is 23 DISMISSED without prejudice to filing a new petition if petitioner obtains the necessary 24 order. Petitioner’s motions (dockets #1 & 2) are also denied.The clerk shall close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: November 29, 2012. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.12\Snyder5716.dsm.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?