Financial Indemnity Company v. Saghari et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 12 Stipulation to be bound by any final resolution rendered by the court in this matter (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)

Download PDF
\\zkpdc\data\clients\FIC COVERAGE\12-11111.01\12-11111.01STIPULATIONOOI.doc     ZINDER & KOCH A Professional Law Corporation 700 N. Brand Blvd., Smte 400 Glendale_, CA 91203 (818) !60-0100 Facsimile (818) 760-0103 1 2 3 4 5   (SPACE BELOW PROVIDED FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) Jeffrey E. Zinder, Esg.- SBN 089980 E-Mml: JEZinder@Z1nderKoch.com   6 Attorneys for Plaintlf FINANCIAL INDElYu ITY COMPANY T 7   8   UNITED STATES DISTRICT 9   10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN JOSE BRANCH   11       0 0 "<j" =. 8 U=No oCil o Case No.: CV12-05844 C W (ADR) Assigned to Honorable C l a u d i a W i l k e n 12 FINANCIAL INDEMNITY 13 COMPANY,     STIPULATION TO BE BOUND BY ANY FINAL RESOLUTION RENDERED BY THE COURT IN THIS MATTER '0\ "0 o(l2:-<a UID 14 -r] ctt cO 15 N;i6 0 r- Plaintiff, vs. 0 16 17 BAHRAM SAGHARI, an individual, 18 19 20 21 22 TABAN KARIMIAN, an individual, JUAN ANTONIO RODRIGUEZGALLEGOS, an individual, JOE P. BETTENCOURT, an individual, STRAIGHT LINE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation, and TOWN OF LOS GATOS, a California Government entity. 23 24 Defendants.   25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TOWN OF LOS GATOS AS FOLLOWS:   28     -1-   STIPULATION AND ORDER \\zkpdc\data\clients\FIC COVERAGE\12-11111.01\12-11111.01STIPULATIONOOl.doc       1 1. That the Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS was properly served in this   2 matter and has reviewed the Complaint.   3 2. That the Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS desires to avoid the fees and   4 costs of participating in the matter.   5 3. That the instant matter involves a determination of insurance coverage on a   6 policy issued by the Plaintiff to Defendants JOE P. BETTENCOURT, an 7 individual, and STRAIGHT LINE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a 8 California corporation, and that Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS is not a 9 named or additional insured tmder said insurance policy.         10 4. That the Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS agrees to be bound by any   11 detemlination made by the Court that resolves this matter as between the other 12 party Defendants and the Plaintiff.   0 0 '<!" 8 U::>No ill. oiZl o ""' o(j.!:-<o ::.:: "0 a:lu"" • t] 5 N;i6 0 0 r- 13 5. That Plaintiff agrees not to pursue any default as against Defendant TOWN 0 14 OF LOS GATOS and upon approval of this Stipulation by the Court to 15 dismiss without prejudice Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS from this 16 matter.   17 6. That Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS in exchange for the ability to not   18 appear and fom1ally defend its position in this action to, and does hereby, 19 waive any and all post judgment rights that it might otherwise have in the 20 event that the Plaintiff is not the prevailing party at the conclusion of this case.       21 7. That should this Stipulation not be accepted and signed by the Court that the   22 Defendant TOWN OF LOS GATOS will enter a general appearance.   23 8. That for all purposes this Stipulation shall be interpreted as if mutually drafted   24 and may be signed by Counsel in separate Counter-parts.   25   26 IIIII   27 IIIII 28     -2-   STIPULATION AND ORDER 01/04/2013 13:47 LAH OFFICES OF ZINDER & KOCH (FAX)81B 760 0103       \\zkpdc\data\clients\FJC COVBRAG \12-11111 .01\12-1111l.OISTIPULATIONOOl.doc     1 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.   2   3 DATED: Januaryt/, 2013 4   5   t:friZ 7 IDER, ESQ. ANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY   8                   9 DATED: January tO, 2013   10   11   12 t=. a   , Jr., ESQ. Attorneys 13   -<11!<':! c.: i.i:i 14 for Defendallt TOWN OF LOS GATOS '0.!:!Q .ge: "': 11 t::lzo 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 DATED: 18 2/6/2013 ---------------------   19   20 HONORABLE Claudia Wilken 21 United States District Judge     22   23   24   25   26   27   28     -3STIPULATION AND ORDER P.OOS/005 G:\clients\FIC COVERAGE\12-lllll.Ol\!2-lllll.OlPROOFOFSERVICE-MEF.doc       1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 2 (Pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1013a)     3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:   I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a paey to the within action; my business address is 700 North Brand 5 B1vd., Ste. 400, Glendale, CA 91203-4276. 4 On January /f/ , 2013, I served the foregoing document described as STIPULATION TO BE BOUND BY ANY FINAL RESOLUTION RENDERED 7 BY THE COURT IN TillS MATTER on all interested parties in this action 6   8 X By placing [] the original [X] a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes aaaTessecf as foliows: 9 Attorney for Defendant, 10 Joseph C. Howard, Jr. Town of Los Gatos Howard, Rome, Martin & Ridle_y, LLP   1775 Woodside Road, Suite 200 11   Redwood City, CA 94061   12 (650) 365-7715   Fax (650) 364-5297           0 0 .... oj ::t" 'o :-"' U N 0 o.-•o -o 13 >0\0 o<la: <c , ""U•" ' r- -@00 Qa:i'O- z..c co t::<U'..... 0 N:z:O 0 0   r- 18     Attorney for Defendant, Joe P. Bettencourt and Straight Line General Construction, Inc.         Randy M. Hess, Esq. 14 Adleson, Hess & Kelly, APC 577 Salmar Avenue, Second Floor 15 Campbell, CA 95008 ( 408) 341-0234 16 Fax (408) 341-0250 17     _x_ ByMail   X As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processmg correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with 19 the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Glendale, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party 20 served.; service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date 1s more tnan one day after the date of deposit for mailing affidavit. 21 22 Executed on January   23   24 /Y, 2013, at Glendale, California. r X. l (S.tate) I declare. under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Cahforma that the above 1s true and correct.   [ ] (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a men1ber of the bar of this   25 court at whose direction the service was made.     26 27   - ,£.Lf MARIA E. FLORES Type or Print Name   >   28     -1-   Proof of Service ,f-f------ fgnature

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?