Cox v. Allin Corporation Plan et al

Filing 165

STIPULATION AND ORDER re briefing schedule and hearing on 159 MOTION for Review of Taxation of Costs filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. Motion Hearing set for 4/7/2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/04/2015. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
Anna M. Martin – CSBN 154279
[e-mail]
1051 Divisadero Street
San Francisco, CA 94115
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.561-8430
Attorneys for Defendants
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
AND ALLIN CORPORATION GROUP LIFE & DISABILITY PLAN
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
Laurence Fred Padway
1516 Oak Street, Suite 109
Alameda, CA 94501
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELGIN K. COX

14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

ELGIN K. COX,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ALLIN CORPORATION PLAN and UNUM )
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
)
AMERICA, et al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)

CASE NO. 4:12-cv-05880-SBA
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
HEARING AND BRIEFING OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR THE
COURT’S REVIEW OF THE CLERK’S
TAXATION OF COSTS TO A DATE
ATLEAST 60 DAYS AFTER THE
JANUARY 13, 2016 HEARING OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER
JUDGMENT

1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING AND BRIEFING OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR THE
COURT’S REVIEW OF THE CLERK’S TAXATIONOF COSTS TO A DATE SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE
JANUARY 13, 2016 HEARING OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT

Case No. 4:12-cv-05880-SBA

28

1

Action Filed: November 16, 2012
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

2
3

To this Honorable Court, counsel for Plaintiff Elgin K. Cox, Defendants Unum Life
4
5

Insurance Company Of America and Allin Corporation Group Life & Disability Plan stipulate to

6

continue the hearing of Defendants’ Motion For The Court’s Review of the Clerk’s Taxation of

7

Costs to a date at least sixty (60) days after the January 13, 2016 hearing of Plaintiff’s Motion To

8

Alter Judgment.

9
10

The parties further seek to continue the opposition and reply briefing deadlines to
correspond to a later hearing date. To that end, the parties stipulate that plaintiff’s opposition

11
12
13

brief will be filed on or before February 12, 2016 and defendants’ reply brief will be filed on or
before February 26, 2016.

14

Good cause exists because the Court’s ruling on the Motion to Alter Judgment, which is

15

set to be heard on January 13, 2016, may have an impact on Defendants’ Motion for the Court’s

16

Review of the Clerk’s Taxation of Costs rendering it unnecessary. This will preserve attorney

17

time and judicial resources.

18
This short continuance will not prejudice any party or the Court and will promote judicial
19
20

economy.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING AND BRIEFING OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR THE
COURT’S REVIEW OF THE CLERK’S TAXATIONOF COSTS TO A DATE SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE
JANUARY 13, 2016 HEARING OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT

Case No. 4:12-cv-05880-SBA

28

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.

2
3

DATED: October 29, 2015

4
5
6

By: /S/ Anna M. Martin
ANNA M. MARTIN
Attorneys for Defendants
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA and ALLIN CORPORATION GROUP
LIFE & DISABILITY PLAN

7
8

LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY

9
10

DATED: October 29, 2015

11
12

By: /S/ Laurence F. Padway
LAURENCE F. PADWAY
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELGIN K. COX

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED:
The Court will hold a hearing on the motion for review of taxation of costs on April 7, 2016.
The Court will hold a hearing on the motion for review of taxation of costs on April 7, 2016.
UNUM Life Insurance Company shall promptly provide a courtesy copy of its motion, which
UNUM Life Insurance Company shall promptly provide a courtesy copy of its motion, which the
the Court has not received. As the April hearing date approaches, if the parties wish to further
Court has not received. As the hearing date approaches, if the parties wish to further extend the
extend the briefing schedule or the hearing date, they may prepare a stipulation for the Court's
briefing schedule or the hearing date, _________________________________________
the may prepare a stipulation for the Court's approval.
approval.
DATED:
____________________
__________________________________
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
Northern District of California
Kandis A. Westmore
11/04/15
DATED:
________________
_____________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
Kandis A. Westmore
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27

3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING AND BRIEFING OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR THE
COURT’S REVIEW OF THE CLERK’S TAXATIONOF COSTS TO A DATE SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE
JANUARY 13, 2016 HEARING OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT

Case No. 4:12-cv-05880-SBA

28