Cox v. Allin Corporation Plan et al

Filing 81

ORDER REFERRING ACTION FOR MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE to Magistrate Judge RYU for Settlement. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/29/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 6 ELGIN COX, Plaintiff, 7 8 vs. Case No: C 12-5880 SBA ORDER REFERRING ACTION FOR MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 9 ALLIN CORPORATION PLAN and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 10 AMERICA; DELL, INC. COMPREHENSIVE WELFARE BENEFITS 11 PLAN; DELL, INC., ADMINISTRATION AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE; 12 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 13 14 15 16 Three dispositive motions (one motion for summary judgment and two motions for 17 judgment as a matter of law) were filed by the parties in this action on January 8, 2014. 18 Dkt. 71, 72, 77. Responses to the motions currently are due on February 4, 2014. On 19 January 23, 2014, the parties filed a stipulated request to extend the response deadline to 20 March 4, 2014, due to the serious medical condition of defense counsel’s family member. 21 Dkt. 80. 22 Now that the parties have filed their respective opening briefs in connection with 23 their dispositive motions, each of them is now fully aware of the factual and legal issues 24 being presented to the Court for its consideration. Rather than expending what undoubtedly 25 will be a considerable amount of resources in preparing responses to the other’s dispositive 26 motions, the parties should, at this juncture, devote their time and energy towards reaching 27 a mutually acceptable resolution of this matter. Accordingly, 28 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 2 1. The instant action is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu for a 3 mandatory settlement conference to take place within ninety (90) days of this order, subject 4 to the Magistrate Judge and the parties’ mutual availability. 5 2. The pending motions shall be held in abeyance pending completion of the 6 mandatory settlement conference, and Docket Nos. 71, 72 and 77 shall be administratively 7 terminated. In the event the action does not settle, the parties shall notify the Court 8 forthwith and the Court will enter a revised motion briefing schedule and set a new hearing 9 date. 10 3. The parties’ stipulated request to continue the briefing schedule on the cross- 11 motions for judgment or summary judgment is DENIED as moot. This Order terminates 12 Docket No. 80. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 29, 2014 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?