Witthauer et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPEALS. Court sets this matter for a Compliance Hearing every three months, with the first such hearing having been set on Friday, 6/14/13 at 9:01am. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/4/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HARRY D. WITTHAUER et al.,
Case No.: 12-CV-05937 YGR
ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING
RESOLUTION OF APPEALS
MCKESSON CORPORATION et al.,
For the reasons stated at the March 11, 2013 Case Management Conference, this action is
Northern District of California
STAYED pending resolution of the appellate proceedings in the remanded cases with which this action
United States District Court
was removed pursuant to the “mass action” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). The Court sets this
matter for a Compliance Hearing every three months, with the first such hearing having been set on
Friday, June 14, 2013 at 9:01 a.m. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the Compliance
Hearing, Plaintiffs must file a Statement updating the Court on the status of the appellate proceedings.
If the Statement has been timely filed, no appearance will be required and the Compliance Hearing
will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the statement has been
submitted in a timely fashion and the Court deems the hearing necessary. Failure to do so may result
In addition, Plaintiffs shall file a notice of ruling when the Ninth Circuit has issued a ruling
that terminates the appeal. Failure to file the Statement, appear at the Compliance Hearing, or file a
notice that the Ninth Circuit has terminated the appeal may result in sanctions, including monetary
sanctions or dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 4, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?