Jalili v. Far East National Bank et al
AMENDED ORDER STRIKING OPPOSITION re 27 Order.. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 01/31/13. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 BERUZ JALILI,
9 FAR EAST NATIONAL BANK, a Federally
Chartered Bank; SINOPA HOLDINGS, a
Foreign Corporation; LIBERTY ASSET
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a
California Corporation; TLH-REO
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California
Limited Liability Company;
GFC SERVICE CORPORATION,
a dissolved California Corporation; and
H & Q ASIA PACIFIC II, LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Case No: C 12-5962 SBA
AMENDED ORDER STRIKING
This Order supercedes Dkt. 27
Dkt. 18, 19
Defendants Far East National Bank and Sinopac Holding’s motion to dismiss and
motion to strike are noticed for hearing on February 5, 2013. Dkt. 11, 12. On January 16,
2013, Plaintiff filed a twenty-one page opposition to the motion to dismiss. Dkt. 18. In
addition, Plaintiff’s oppositions to Defendants’ motions were e-filed with the “track-
changes” feature left intact, thereby rendering the briefs difficult to read.
The Court’s Standing Orders expressly limit motions and oppositions to fifteen
pages. See Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and Deadlines, Dkt. 2-1 at
4. The Standing Orders further state that any brief filed “in an improper manner or form
shall not be received or considered by the Court.” Id.; see Swanson v. U.S. Forest Serv., 87
F.3d 339, 345 (9th Cir. 1996) (courts have discretion to strike oversized briefs).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) and
Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Strike (Dkt. 19) shall be STRICKEN from the
record. Plaintiff is granted leave to file conforming oppositions by no later than February
5, 2013. The motion hearing scheduled for February 5, 2013 is CONTINUED to April 2,
2013 at 1:00 p.m., to coincide with the hearing scheduled on the other Defendants’ motion
to dismiss (Dkt. 20). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court may resolve the
motions without oral argument. The parties are advised the check the Court’s website to
determine whether an appearance is required.
The telephonic Case Management Conference currently scheduled for
February 21, 2013 is CONTINUED to May 10, 2013 at 3:15 p.m. Prior to the date
scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case
Management Conference Statement which complies with the Standing Order for All Judges
of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff shall
assume responsibility for filing the joint statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the
conference date. Plaintiff’s counsel is to set up the conference call with all the parties on
the line and call chambers at (510) 637-3559. NO PARTY SHALL CONTACT
CHAMBERS DIRECTLY WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF THE COURT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 31, 2013
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?