Maples v. Solarwinds, Inc.
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 51 MOTION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (terminating 47 Motion to Continue) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 MIKE MAPLE, JR.,
Plaintiff,
7
8
Case No: C 12-6066 SBA
vs.
9 SOLARWINDS, INC., and DOES 1-5,
Defendants.
10
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Dkt. 47, 51
11
12
Good cause appearing,
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
14
1.
Plaintiff’s motion to modify the briefing schedule on Defendant’s motion for
15
summary judgment is GRANTED. The deadlines for the opposition and reply briefs are
16
now April 3, 2014, and April 10, 2014, respectively. The motion hearing is CONTINUED
17
from March 25, 2014, to April 29, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. The Court, in its discretion, may
18
resolve the motion without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The parties are advised to
19
check the Court’s website to determine whether a court appearance is required.
20
21
2.
To accommodate the new motion hearing date, the following dates previously
set in the Order for Pretrial Preparation (Dkt. 19) are modified as follows:
22
a.
Pretrial Preparation due: 6/3/14
23
b.
Motions in Limine/Objections to Evidence due: 6/10/14
24
c.
Responses due: 6/17/14
25
d.
Replies due: 6/24/14
26
e.
Pretrial Conference: 7/15/14 at 1:00 p.m.
27
f.
Trial: 7/21/14 at 8:30 a.m.
28
g.
Mandatory Settlement Conference: 5/5/14-5/30/14
1
2
3
4
All other dates and deadlines in the Order for Pretrial Preparation shall remain
unchanged. This Order terminates Docket 47 and 51.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2014
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
Senior United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?