POGA MGMT PTNRS LLC v. Medfiler LLC et al
Filing
121
ORDER re 120 Response filed by POGA MGMT PTNRS LLC. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 6/15/2015. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISION
7
8
POGA MGMT PTNRS LLC,
Case No. 12-cv-06087-SBA (NJV)
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION
v.
10
11
MEDFILER LLC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 120
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
Although not filed as a motion to reconsider or vacate, Plaintiff has filed a Memorandum
15
of Opposition, in which Plaintiff requests this court vacate its Order of June 11, 2015, which
16
canceled the settlement conference set for June 17, 2015. See (Doc. 120). The court issued the
17
Order that cancelled the settlement conference and reset the matter for a status conference upon
18
consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Continue. (Doc. 118). Plaintiff’s present concern is that
19
the court did so prior to allowing Plaintiff to file an opposition.
20
The court considered the request made by Defendants, Defendants’ representation that
21
Plaintiff opposed the request (the court is well aware of the benefits of early settlement of a case to
22
both the parties and the court and whether early settlement conferences can be productive),
23
Defendants’ assertion that a settlement conference would be unproductive prior to the issuance of
24
an order on summary judgment, and the fact that the settlement conference was scheduled to occur
25
within four business days of the request to cancel. After taking all of these issues into
26
consideration the court determined that the best course was to grant the continuance.
27
28
Now, after consideration of Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Opposition, the court’s opinion
1
2
remains unaltered.1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the request to vacate the court’s Order of
3
June 11, 2015 is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: June 15, 2015
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
The court notes that while counsel and the parties are subject to the provisions of the Local
Rules, the court certainly is not. The court may run its calendar and manage its recourses as it sees
fit. The court’s Order of June 11, 2015, pursuant to L.R. 7-11(c), supersedes any opposition
deadlines.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?