Jensen v. Virgin Atlantic et al

Filing 12

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/23/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 CHRISTIAN K. JENSEN, 8 9 Plaintiff(s), v. 10 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS VIRGIN ATLANTIC et al., 11 Case No.: 12-CV-06227 YGR Defendant(s). Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 On June 21, 2012, Plaintiff Christian K. Jensen filed this action in the San Francisco Superior 14 Court. Defendant Virgin Atlantic removed the action to this Court on or about December 7, 2012. 15 Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) and noticed the hearing for January 29, 2013. 16 Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or about December 31, 2012. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). 17 To date, Plaintiff has failed to oppose the Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file an opposition 18 to the Motion to Dismiss no later than February 8, 2013. Failure to file an opposition by that date will 19 result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute. 20 21 Any reply to an opposition must be served and filed not more than 7 days after the opposition is served and filed. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). 22 The hearing date of January 29, 2013 is hereby CONTINUED to February 26, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 23, 2013 _________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?