Cooney v. California Public Utilities Commission et al

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Wilken granting in part 35 Motion to Continue (cwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 No. C 12-6466 CW DEBORAH COONEY, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE (Docket No. 35) Plaintiff, v. 7 8 THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, ET AL., 9 Defendants. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 / 11 12 On October 2, 2013, pro se Plaintiff Deborah Cooney filed a 13 motion to extend the October 4, 2013 deadline for her opposition 14 to Defendant Itron Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss and continue the 15 November 7, 2013 hearing date on that motion. 16 Inc. opposes the motion. 17 or prejudice would result from a denial of the requested 18 continuance including “chilling settlement negotiations, 19 preventing the Plaintiff from properly presenting the legal issues 20 before the Court, interfering with the course of a FRCP Rule 21 11(c)(2) motion for sanctions, and allowing Defendant Itron’s 22 Counsel to continue harassing the Plaintiff through the course of 23 this litigation.” Defendant Itron Plaintiff states that substantial harm 24 The Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to continue in part. 25 Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant Itron Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss 26 shall be filed on or before October 18, 2013. 27 reply, if any, shall be filed on or before October 25, 2013. 28 Defendant Itron’s At October 4, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?