Cox v. Gruma Corporation
Filing
14
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 11 Stipulation (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
ELIZABETH COX, as an individual and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
9
Case No.: 12-06502-YGR
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING
(DKT. NO. 11)
vs.
GRUMA CORPORATION,
10
Defendant.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation at Dkt. No. 11. The Court DENIES the request
13
to schedule a hearing date on the pending motion for class certification but to otherwise suspend
14
briefing. If Plaintiff seeks sufficient time for discovery to support a motion for class certification,
15
Plaintiff shall withdraw the pending motion until she can prepare an adequate motion.
16
To the extent that Plaintiff still seeks to schedule a hearing date notwithstanding the
17
anticipated motion to dismiss, the parties shall meet and confer to propose a briefing schedule and
18
hearing date for class certification. The parties shall take into account: (i) the Defendant’s anticipated
19
motion to dismiss; (ii) the time needed for discovery; and (iii) providing the Court with at least three
20
weeks to consider all briefs prior to the class certification hearing.
21
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 11.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: January 16, 2013
25
_______________________________________
26
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?