Cox v. Gruma Corporation
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 65 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
OAKLAND DIVISION
4
ELIZABETH COX, as an individual, and on
5 behalf of all others similarly situated,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE
Plaintiffs,
6
7
Case No. 12-cv-06502-YGR
v.
8 GRUMA CORPORATION,
9
Defendant.
10
11
On this day the Court considered the unopposed motion of Defendant Gruma Corporation
12 for leave to reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Supplemental Brief Regarding Referral to the United
13 States Food and Drug Administration Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 10.25(c).
14
Having considered the unopposed motion and briefing on file, the Court is of the opinion
15 that the motion is proper and should be GRANTED.
16
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Gruma Corporation be GRANTED leave to reply
17 to Plaintiff’s Response to Supplemental Brief Regarding Referral to the United States Food and
18 Drug Administration Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 10.25(c).
19
Accordingly, Defendant Gruma Corporation shall have two days from the date of this
20 Order to file its Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Supplemental Brief Regarding Referral to the
21 United States Food and Drug Administration Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 10.25(c), attached as
22 Exhibit A to Defendant’s Motion for Leave.
23
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 65.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26 Dated: June 28, 2013
__________________________________
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Court Judge
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?