Integral Development Corp v. Tolat
Filing
373
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DE NOVO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/12/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
11
No. C 12-06575 JSW
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
v.
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DENYING DE NOVO MOTION
FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND
COSTS
VIRAL TOLAT,
14
Defendant.
15
16
/
17
18
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and
19
Recommendation (“Report”) issued by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, in which she
20
recommends that the Court deny Defendant Viral Tolat’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.
21
On December 26, 2014, Defendant filed objections to the Report and a motion for de novo
22
determination of fees.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the motion noticed for hearing
23
24
on Friday, February 27, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., is appropriate for decision without oral argument.
25
Accordingly, the hearing date is hereby VACATED. Having considered the Report, the parties’
26
papers, relevant legal authority, the record in this case,1 and having reviewed the matter de
27
28
In addition, Defendant’s administrative motion to augment the record is GRANTED
and Plaintiff’s request to further supplement the record is GRANTED.
1
1
novo, the Court finds the Report thorough and well-reasoned and adopts it in every respect.
2
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is DENIED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
February 12, 2015
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?