Grimes v. Doe et al

Filing 1

ORDER RETURNING COMPLAINT TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/7/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

JEROME L. GRIMES,

5

Plaintiff,

6

v.

7

ORDER RETURNING
COMPLAINT TO
PLAINTIFF

DOE, et al.,

8
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

No. C 12-80132M CW

Defendants.
________________________________/
On December 9, 2005, this Court entered a pre-filing order

11

regarding the cases filed by Plaintiff Jerome Grimes.

12

filing order states that if Plaintiff files a complaint that is

13

“related to any of the following matters:

14
15
16
17
18

The pre-

(1) a diversified group of individuals who commit acts
of terror against Mr. Grimes, his family and other
citizens;
(2) an injunction against the defendants to prevent them
from kidnaping, framing, falsely imprisoning or
otherwise terrorizing Mr. Grimes, his family, and other
citizens;

19

(3) a court order for the defendants to be subjected to
a lie detector test;

20

(4) covert terrorism

21

it will not be filed unless it presents cognizable claims that are

22

not based on merely conclusory allegations.

23

complaints filed by Mr. Grimes while he is not incarcerated or

24

detained will be filed unless they contain intelligible factual

25

allegations and claims for relief.”

Second, no other

26

The Court has reviewed the instant complaint and amended

27

complaint, C12-80132M, and finds that they allege that Defendants

28

are engaged in covert terrorism and that they conspired with a

1

diverse group of others to commit acts of terror against Mr.

2

Grimes and others.

3

Defendants from engaging in actions “with terror intent” against

4

Mr. Grimes, his family and others.

5

cognizable causes of action.

6

complaint concern multiple matters mentioned in the pre-filing

7

order and present no cognizable causes of action, the Clerk of the

8

Court is ordered not to file them.

9

be returned to Plaintiff.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

They also seek an injunction prevented

Mr. Grimes alleges no

Because the complaint and amended

Instead, the complaints shall

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

Dated:

8/7/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2