Schmidt et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/17/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JAMES SCHMIDT, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, v. 12 JP MORGAN CHASE, et al., 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 On January 8, 2013, Plaintiffs James M. Schmidt and Robert M. Schmidt filed suit in this 16 Court, along with applications to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1-3.] The IFP 17 applications were granted on January 23, 2013. [Docket No. 6.] On February 21, 2013, Defendants 18 JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company filed a motion to dismiss 19 Plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs did not respond to the motion. On March 15, 2013, the court issued 20 an Order to Show Cause, instructing Plaintiffs to submit a written statement by no later than March 21 25, 2013 explaining their failure to respond to the motion. [Docket No. 23.] Plaintiffs did not 22 respond to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, this matter is hereby dismissed without prejudice 23 for failure to prosecute. RT J H ER R NIA S DONNA M. RYU M. Ryu United States dge Donna Magistrate Judge u NO 28 I FO 27 Dated: April 17, 2013 ERED ORD T IS SO LI 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. A 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 24 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-13-00098 DMR N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?