Schmidt et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/17/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JAMES SCHMIDT, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
12
JP MORGAN CHASE, et al.,
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
On January 8, 2013, Plaintiffs James M. Schmidt and Robert M. Schmidt filed suit in this
16
Court, along with applications to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1-3.] The IFP
17
applications were granted on January 23, 2013. [Docket No. 6.] On February 21, 2013, Defendants
18
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company filed a motion to dismiss
19
Plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs did not respond to the motion. On March 15, 2013, the court issued
20
an Order to Show Cause, instructing Plaintiffs to submit a written statement by no later than March
21
25, 2013 explaining their failure to respond to the motion. [Docket No. 23.] Plaintiffs did not
22
respond to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, this matter is hereby dismissed without prejudice
23
for failure to prosecute.
RT
J
H
ER
R NIA
S
DONNA M. RYU
M. Ryu
United States dge Donna
Magistrate Judge
u
NO
28
I
FO
27
Dated: April 17, 2013
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
LI
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
24
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-13-00098 DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?