Linex Technologies, Inc. v. Hewett-Packard Company et al

Filing 260

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 255 Third Party MOTION To Stay Order Addressing 248 Motions to Seal and for Leave to File Declarations in support of 197 Motion to Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MICHAEL A. MOLANO (SBN 171057)
[e-mail]
MAYER BROWN LLP
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

SETH B. HERRING (SBN 253907)
[e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street
Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Attorneys for Third-Party
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.

Attorneys for Third-Party
Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13

LINEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

14

19

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
THIRD-PARTIES MARVELL
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND
QUALCOMM ATHEROS, INC.’S JOINT
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO STAY ORDER
ADDRESSING MOTIONS TO SEAL
(DKT. NO. 248) AND FOR LEAVE TO
FILE DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT
OF LINEX, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 197)

20

Honorable Claudia Wilken

15
16
17

Plaintiff,

Case No. 4:13-cv-00159-CW (MEJ)

v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, APPLE
COMPUTER INC., ARUBA NETWORKS,
INC., MERU NETWORKS, INC., RUCKUS
WIRELESS, INC.

18
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER;
CASE NO. 4:13-CV-00159-CW (MEJ)
708043789.1

1

Upon consideration of Third-Parties Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Marvell”) and

2

Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.’s (“Qualcomm Atheros”) Joint Unopposed Administrative Motion to

3

Stay Order Addressing Motions to Seal (Dkt. No. 248) and for Leave to File Declarations in

4

Support of Linex’s Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Seal, the Court hereby rules as follows:

5

Marvell and Qualcomm Atheros’s Joint Unopposed Motion (“Joint Motion”) is GRANTED, and

6

this Court’s prior Order Addressing Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 248) is STAYED. In light of the

7

declarations of Michael A. Molano (“Molano Declaration”), Seth B. Herring (“Herring

8

Declaration”), and Mark C. Scarsi (“Scarsi Declaration”) submitted with the instant Joint

9

Motion, the Court finds that the exhibits referenced in the Molano, Herring, and Scarsi

10

Declarations—originally filed conditionally under seal in support of Linex Technologies, Inc.’s

11

Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions—are to remain under seal.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14

Dated: December 4, 2013
________, 2013

___________________________________

15

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER;
CASE NO. 4:13-CV-00159-CW (MEJ)