Linex Technologies, Inc. v. Hewett-Packard Company et al
Filing
260
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 255 Third Party MOTION To Stay Order Addressing 248 Motions to Seal and for Leave to File Declarations in support of 197 Motion to Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MICHAEL A. MOLANO (SBN 171057)
mmolano@mayerbrown.com
MAYER BROWN LLP
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Tel: (650) 331-2000
Fax: (650) 331-2061
SETH B. HERRING (SBN 253907)
sherring@reedsmith.com
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street
Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: (415) 659-5954
Fax: (415) 391-8269
Attorneys for Third-Party
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Attorneys for Third-Party
Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
LINEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
14
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
THIRD-PARTIES MARVELL
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND
QUALCOMM ATHEROS, INC.’S JOINT
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO STAY ORDER
ADDRESSING MOTIONS TO SEAL
(DKT. NO. 248) AND FOR LEAVE TO
FILE DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT
OF LINEX, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 197)
20
Honorable Claudia Wilken
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
Case No. 4:13-cv-00159-CW (MEJ)
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, APPLE
COMPUTER INC., ARUBA NETWORKS,
INC., MERU NETWORKS, INC., RUCKUS
WIRELESS, INC.
18
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER;
CASE NO. 4:13-CV-00159-CW (MEJ)
708043789.1
1
Upon consideration of Third-Parties Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Marvell”) and
2
Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.’s (“Qualcomm Atheros”) Joint Unopposed Administrative Motion to
3
Stay Order Addressing Motions to Seal (Dkt. No. 248) and for Leave to File Declarations in
4
Support of Linex’s Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Seal, the Court hereby rules as follows:
5
Marvell and Qualcomm Atheros’s Joint Unopposed Motion (“Joint Motion”) is GRANTED, and
6
this Court’s prior Order Addressing Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 248) is STAYED. In light of the
7
declarations of Michael A. Molano (“Molano Declaration”), Seth B. Herring (“Herring
8
Declaration”), and Mark C. Scarsi (“Scarsi Declaration”) submitted with the instant Joint
9
Motion, the Court finds that the exhibits referenced in the Molano, Herring, and Scarsi
10
Declarations—originally filed conditionally under seal in support of Linex Technologies, Inc.’s
11
Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions—are to remain under seal.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated: December 4, 2013
________, 2013
___________________________________
15
THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER;
CASE NO. 4:13-CV-00159-CW (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?