Torres v. Compass Group USA, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER Granting 23 STIPULATION to Dismiss Action with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 2/6/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 BETH A. HUBER (SBN 184702) THE HUBER LAW FIRM 807 E Street San Rafael, California 94901 Telephone: (415) 456-4411 Facsimile: (415) 453-8269 E-mail: bhuber@huberlawfirm.net Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY GEORGE TORRES 6 7 8 9 10 FRANCIS 1. ORTMAN III (SBN 213202) JUSTIN T. CURLEY (SBN 233287) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 E-mail: fortman@seyfarth.com E-mail: jcurley@scyfarth.com 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 MARY GEORGE TORRES, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 vs. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. dba EUREST DINING SERVICES, and Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Case No. 13-cv-00179-SBA JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: Judge: FAC FAC fAC Trial September 19, 2013 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong Filed: Served: Removed: Date: December 12 , 2012 December 13,2012 January 14,2013 July 14,2014 Plaintiff Mary Torres ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Compass Group USA, Inc. dba Eurest Dining Services ("Compass" or "Defendant") (together, the "Parties") jointly stipulate that this action is to be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties' settlement of the matter and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A). Each party is to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. 28 JOINT STlPlJLATlON TO DISMISS ACTION Case No. 13-cv-00179-SBA DATED: September 20,2013 THE HUBER LAW FIRM 2 ., -' By sf Beth A. Huber Beth A. Buber 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY GEORGE TORRES 5 6 7 DATED: September 20,2013 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP By sf Justin T. Curley Francis J. Ortman III Justin T. Curley 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 DATED: 2/6/2014 ,2013 HONORABLE ARMSTRONG 17 SAUNDRA BROWN 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT srn-ur.« nON TO DISMISS ACTION Case No. 13-cv-00179-SBA 1 2 3 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Elizabeth Erickson, declare: I am a resident of the United States, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the above captioned suit. My business address is 807 E Street, San Rafael, California 94901. I am readily familiar with my offices' business practices for collection and processing of correspondence. 5 On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s): 6 JOINT STIPULATION [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND 7 8 _X_ (By mail) I caused each of the above document(s) to be placed in a sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, to be deposited this date in San Rafael, California addressed to each party or parties at the addresses listed below 9 __ (By Personal Service) I delivered by hand on this date the above document(s), sealed in an envelope, to the party listed below at the address indicated. _ (By Overnight Mail) On this date I placed the above document(s) to be picked up by California Overnight, an overnight courier service, to deliver to the party or parties listed below at the address indicated. __ (By E-Mail) I E-Mailed the above document(s) on this date to the party or parties indicated below at the E-Mail address indicated 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 FRANCIS 1. ORTMANN III, ESQ. JUSTIN T. CURLEY, ESQ. SEYFARTH SHA W LLP 560 Mission Street Suite 3100 San Francisco, CA 94105 JCurley@seyfarth.com Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United State of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 22 23 Executed on October 3, 2013 at San Rafael, California. 24 Elizabeth Erickson 25 26 27 28 Proof

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?