Cruz v. Quang et al

Filing 35

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/5/2013 02:00 PM. Show Cause Response due by 10/18/2013. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/4/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JOSE CRUZ AND HENDRO WINOTO, Plaintiffs, 7 8 9 10 Case No.: 13-cv-00181-YGR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED vs. BRANDON QUANG AND NCBI INVESTMENT, INC., 11 Defendants. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 13 You are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than October 18, 2013, why 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave To Amend (Dkt. No. 29) to add Shao Rong Zhang, Hardiato Go, and Zhou Xian Chen as defendants to all Plaintiffs’ state law claims should not be denied as futile. See Martinez v. Combs, 49 Cal.4th 35, 66 (2010) (individuals acting as agents of “employer” not liable for wage violations); see also Reynolds v. Bement, 36 Cal.4th 1075 (2005) (same). Otherwise, the Court is inclined to grant leave to add Hendro Winoto as a plaintiff to all state law claims, and to add Shao Rong Zhang, Hardiato Go, and Zhou Xian Chen as defendants to the Fair Labor Standards Act claim. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause shall be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2013, on the Court’s 2:00 p.m. calendar, in Courtroom 5, U.S. District Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. If the Court is satisfied with Plaintiffs’ counsel’s response, it will consider taking the Order to Show Cause hearing off calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: October 4, 2013 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?