Ingram v. City of San Francisco Police Department et al

Filing 23

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH STANDING ORDER. Reset Deadlines as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(B)(6) : Motion Hearing set for 4/11/2013 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/8/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2013)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

BARRY G. INGRAM,
Plaintiff,

5
6

No. C 13-0224 CW

v.

7

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.

8

Defendants.
________________________________/

9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING AND
DIRECTING
PLAINTIFF TO
COMPLY WITH
STANDING ORDER

On March 5, 2013, Defendant Officers Frazer, Fiorello, and

11

Khmarskiy filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Barry Ingram’s

12

complaint.

13

11, 2013.

14

Defendant City of San Francisco and noticed for hearing on March

15

21, 2013.

16

hearing on Defendant San Francisco’s motion to dismiss shall be

17

continued to April 11, 2013 so that it can be heard concurrently

18

with the individual Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

19

Docket No. 19.

The motion is set for hearing on April

Another motion to dismiss was previously filed by

Docket No. 12.

In the interest of efficiency, the

If Plaintiff wishes to appear by telephone for the hearing,

20

he must properly file a motion seeking leave to do so.

21

is directed to consult the Court’s standing order regarding

22

procedures for appearing by telephone, located on the Court’s

23

website: http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/cworders.

24

Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: 3/8/2013

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge