Xie v. MF Fund II, LP et al
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff Shao Q. Xie is ordered to respond by April 21, 2013, and show cause for Plaintiffs failure to respond to the motion to dismiss. In addition, Plaintiff is ordered to file any proofs of service by April 21, 2013 so that the court may determine which of the defendants have been served. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/12/13. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SHAO Q. XIE,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
No. C-13-00401 DMR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
13
MF FUND II LP, et al.
14
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Defendants Craig Lipton and MF Fund II, LP have filed a Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6]
that is set for a hearing on May 9, 2013. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to
Defendants’ Motion was due on April 5, 2013, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiff
Shao Q. Xie is ordered to respond by April 21, 2013, and show cause for Plaintiff’s failure to
respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternatively to file a statement
of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause
does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing on May 9, 2013 is VACATED.
A new hearing shall be noticed by the court if necessary. If Plaintiff does not respond by April 21,
2013, Defendant’s motion may be granted and the case may be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to
prosecute.
In addition, Plaintiff is ordered to file any proofs of service by April 21, 2013 so that the
court may determine which of the defendants have been served.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2013
27
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?