Goldson v. David

Filing 6

ORDER OF SERVICE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/15/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

OAKLAND DIVISION

6
7

RODNEY GOLDSON,
Plaintiff,

8
vs.

9

ORDER OF SERVICE

DR. CLARENE DAVID,
Defendant.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 13-0403 PJH (PR)

/
12
13

Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, has

14

filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s original complaint

15

was dismissed and he has filed an amended complaint.

16
17
18

DISCUSSION
A.

Standard of Review
Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners

19

seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.

20

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and

21

dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may

22

be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at

23

1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police

24

Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990).

25

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only "a short and plain statement of

26

the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." "Specific facts are not necessary;

27

the statement need only '"give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . . claim is and the

28

grounds upon which it rests."'" Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (citations

allegations, . . . a plaintiff's obligation to provide the 'grounds’ of his 'entitle[ment] to relief'

3

requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a

4

cause of action will not do. . . . Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief

5

above the speculative level." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)

6

(citations omitted). A complaint must proffer "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is

7

plausible on its face." Id. at 570. The United States Supreme Court has recently explained

8

the “plausible on its face” standard of Twombly: “While legal conclusions can provide the

9

framework of a complaint, they must be supported by factual allegations. When there are

10

well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their veracity and then determine

11
For the Northern District of California

omitted). Although in order to state a claim a complaint “does not need detailed factual

2

United States District Court

1

whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct.

12

1937, 1950 (2009).

13

To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential

14

elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was

15

violated, and (2) that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the

16

color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

17

B.

Legal Claims

18

Plaintiff states he has severe joint separation in his left shoulder. The sole

19

defendant in this case, Dr. David, refused requests for an X-ray, MRI or a referral to an

20

orthopedic specialist, from February 2012 to June 2012, even though plaintiff states he was

21

in great pain. At some point plaintiff was referred to an orthopedic specialist who

22

recommended surgery and noted that plaintiff’s condition worsened as a result of the delay.

23

This claim is sufficient to proceed.

24

Deliberate indifference to serious medical needs violates the Eighth Amendment's

25

proscription against cruel and unusual punishment. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104

26

(1976); McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir. 1992), overruled on other

27

grounds, WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc).

28

A determination of "deliberate indifference" involves an examination of two elements: the
2

1

seriousness of the prisoner's medical need and the nature of the defendant's response to

2

that need. Id. at 1059.

3

A "serious" medical need exists if the failure to treat a prisoner's condition could

4

result in further significant injury or the "unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain." Id. The

5

existence of an injury that a reasonable doctor or patient would find important and worthy of

6

comment or treatment; the presence of a medical condition that significantly affects an

7

individual's daily activities; or the existence of chronic and substantial pain are examples of

8

indications that a prisoner has a "serious" need for medical treatment. Id. at 1059-60.
CONCLUSION

10

1. The clerk shall issue a summons and the United States Marshal shall serve,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

without prepayment of fees, copies of the complaint with attachments and copies of this

12

order on the following defendant: Dr. Clarene David at San Quentin State Prison.

13
14

3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the court orders as follows:
a. No later than sixty days from the date of service, defendant shall file a

15

motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. The motion shall be supported

16

by adequate factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to Federal Rule of

17

Civil Procedure 56, and shall include as exhibits all records and incident reports stemming

18

from the events at issue. If defendant is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by

19

summary judgment, she shall so inform the court prior to the date her summary judgment

20

motion is due. All papers filed with the court shall be promptly served on the plaintiff.

21

b. At the time the dispositive motion is served, defendant shall also serve, on

22

a separate paper, the appropriate notice or notices required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d

23

952, 953-954 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n. 4

24

(9th Cir. 2003). See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 940-941 (9th Cir. 2012) (Rand and

25

Wyatt notices must be given at the time motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss

26

for nonexhaustion is filed, not earlier); Rand at 960 (separate paper requirement).

27
28

c. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the
court and served upon defendants no later than thirty days from the date the motion was
3

1

served upon him. Plaintiff must read the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING,”

2

which is provided to him pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir.

3

1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).

4

If defendant files an unenumerated motion to dismiss claiming that plaintiff failed to

5

exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), plaintiff

6

should take note of the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING (EXHAUSTION),”

7

which is provided to him as required by Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n. 4 (9th

8

Cir. 2003).

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

d. If defendant wishes to file a reply brief, she shall do so no later than fifteen
days after the opposition is served upon her.
e. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is
due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date.
4. All communications by plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant, or

14

defendant’s counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the

15

document to defendants or defendants' counsel.

16

5. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

17

No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) is required before the

18

parties may conduct discovery.

19

6. It is plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court

20

informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed “Notice

21

of Change of Address.” He also must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion.

22

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to

23

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 15, 2013.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge

26
27

G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.13\Goldson0403.serve.wpd

28
4

1

NOTICE -- WARNING (SUMMARY JUDGMENT)

2

If defendants move for summary judgment, they are seeking to have your case

3

dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil

4

Procedure will, if granted, end your case.

judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue

7

of material fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result

8

of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter

9

of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary

10

judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot

11
For the Northern District of California

Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary

6

United States District Court

5

simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in

12

declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as

13

provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and

14

documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not

15

submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered

16

against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be

17

no trial.

18
19
20
21
22

NOTICE -- WARNING (EXHAUSTION)
If defendants file an unenumerated motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, they are
seeking to have your case dismissed. If the motion is granted it will end your case.
You have the right to present any evidence you may have which tends to show that

23

you did exhaust your administrative remedies. Such evidence may be in the form of

24

declarations (statements signed under penalty of perjury) or authenticated documents, that

25

is, documents accompanied by a declaration showing where they came from and why they

26

are authentic, or other sworn papers, such as answers to interrogatories or depositions.

27
28

If defendants file a motion to dismiss and it is granted, your case will be dismissed
and there will be no trial.
5