Hayes et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 32

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS; DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY WILL CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES;AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 Amended MOTION to Dismis s First Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 5/28/2013 is CONTINUED to 8/13/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Case Management Conference set for 6/17/2013 is CONTINUED to 8/26/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/16/13. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10

RALPH HAYES, KENNETH HAYES, AND RUTH
HAYES,
Plaintiff(s),

11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. A//K/A WELLS
FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, F/K/A WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, FSB, F/K/A/ WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB, AND DOES 1-10,

Case No.: 13-CV-420 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION
TO DISMISS; DIRECTING PARTIES TO
INFORM THE COURT WHETHER THEY WILL
CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
ALL PURPOSES; AND CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendants.

16

The Motion of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to Dismiss is currently set
17

for hearing on May 28, 2013. The Court, on its own motion, CONTINUES the hearing on these
18

motions to August 13, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5, Federal Courthouse, Oakland.
19

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to
20

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See
21

Civil L.R. 73-1(b). This option is being made available because the magistrate judges in this district
22

have smaller civil dockets and no felony criminal cases and may be able to adjudicate this case more
23

expeditiously than the undersigned district judge. The parties are further advised that they may jointly
24

request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.
25

The parties are hereby DIRECTED to review the profiles of each magistrate judge on the
26

Court’s website, and then meet and confer as to whether they can agree on a specific magistrate judge
27

of their choosing. The parties shall advise the Court, no later than May 28, 2013, whether they
28

1

consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action. For the

2

parties’ convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also available at

3

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.

4
5
6
7

The case management conference currently set for June 17, 2013, is CONTINUED to August
26, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 16, 2013
_________________________________________

8

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2