Alcaraz et al v. Napolitano et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint, Second Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Alan Bersin, Timothy S. Aitken, John Morton, Eric Holder, John Kerry, Janet Napolitano. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/12/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2013)
7
STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
DAVID J. KLINE
Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section
LANA L. VAHAB (DC 976203)
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 868
Washington, DC 20044
Telephone: (202) 532-4067
Facsimile: (202) 305-7000
E-mail: Lana.Vahab@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
9
10
11
BERNAVE ALCARAZ, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
JANET NAPOLITANO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: C 13-511 SBA
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME WITHIN WHICH THE
DEFENDANTS MUST FILE AN ANSWER
OR OTHERWISE RESPOND and ORDER
18
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
19
Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their
20
attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to an extension of time
21
within which the Defendants must serve their answer, or other responsive pleading to the
22
complaint. In support thereof, the parties state as follows:
23
1. Plaintiffs filed the instant complaint for money damages on February 5, 2013. (ECF No.
24
1.)
25
2. Plaintiffs properly effectuated service on those Defendants sued in their official
26
capacities on February 7, 2013.
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
CASE NO. C 13-CV-511-SBA
1
1
3. According to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3), Defendants’ original deadline to answer or
2
otherwise respond to the complaint is April 8, 2013. Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation to
3
Extend Time (ECF No. 11), this original deadline was extended to April 12, 2013.
4
4. On April 10, 2013, after a discussion with Defendants’ counsel, counsel for Plaintiffs
5
informed Defendants’ counsel that he plans to file an amended complaint in this action by
6
approximately April 19, 2013.
7
5. In the interest of judicial economy, the parties agree that Defendants will not respond to
8
Plaintiffs’ original complaint, but will instead wait for Plaintiffs to file their First Amended
9
Complaint and will then respond in accordance with the time allotted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
10
11
6. The undersigned contacted Plaintiffs’ counsel, H. Nelson Meeks, by e-mail on April 11,
2013, regarding this stipulation. Mr. Meeks indicated that he agreed to this stipulation.
12
13
Dated: April 11, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
/s/ Lana L. VAHAB
LANA L. VAHAB
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: (202) 532-4067
Facsimile: (202) 305-7000
E-mail: lana.vahab@usdoj.gov
14
15
16
17
DAVID J. KLINE
Director
18
19
20
21
Attorneys for Defendants
22
/s/ H. Nelson Meeks (with permission)
H. NELSON MEEKS
Law Office of H. Nelson Meeks
870 Market Street
Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 989-9915
Facsimile: (415) 989-9914
E-mail: nelson@nelsonmeekslaw.com
Dated: April 11, 2013
23
24
25
26
27
Attorney for Plaintiffs
28
SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
CASE NO. C 13-CV-511-SBA
2
1
2
ORDER
3
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
DATE: 4/12/13
__________________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
CASE NO. C 13-CV-511-SBA
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?