Morshed v. County of Lake, California
Filing
20
ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT PRETRIAL ORDER. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
Case No.: 13-CV-521 YGR
MICHAEL D. MORSHED,
ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF
TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER
Plaintiff,
vs.
COUNTY OF LAKE, et al.,
Defendant.
9
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
10
The Case Management Conference currently set for Monday, July 15, 2013, is CONTINUED to
11
Monday, July 22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and believes the case
13
can proceed under the schedule set forth below. If these dates are acceptable to all parties, they may
14
file a JOINT Stipulation to the proposed dates by no later than Monday, July 15, 2013. Upon
15
receipt, the Court will confirm the dates in a separate order and the continued conference scheduled
16
for Monday, July 22, 2013, will be taken off calendar. If a JOINT Stipulation is not filed, the
17
conference will go forward as scheduled and the parties will be required to appear.
18
TENTATIVE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
19
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:
Monday, November 18, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
REFERRED TO ADR FOR COURT MEDIATION TO BE
COMPLETED BY:
October 31, 2013
LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:
July 31, 2013
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
December 20, 2013
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):
Opening: November 15, 2013
Rebuttal: December 2, 2013
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
December 20, 2013
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 TO BE HEARD BY:
February 25, 2014
2
Friday, May 2, 2014 at 9:01 a.m.
3
COMPLIANCE HEARING
(See PAGE 2)
4
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:
May 2, 2014
5
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
Friday, May 23, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
6
TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:
Monday, June 9, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. for 5 days
Jury Trial
7
8
The Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases have significant requirements, including
twenty-eight days in advance of the Pretrial Conference and to meet and confer at least twenty-one
11
(21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. However, in certain cases, more time may be
12
Northern District of California
various deadlines to prepare for trial. At a minimum, trial counsel are required to make exchanges
10
United States District Court
9
necessary to prepare in light of the complexities of the case.
13
A Compliance Hearing is set to confirm that counsel have timely met and conferred as
14
required by the Standing Pretrial Instructions Order and any specific such order for this action. Five
15
(5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a Joint Statement
16
confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If
17
compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off
18
calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a Joint Statement in a
19
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
20
21
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures, as well as
22
Court’s Standing Order for Certain Employment Cases. All Standing Orders are available on the
23
Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: July 11, 2013
_______________________________________
26
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?