Morshed v. County of Lake, California

Filing 20

ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT PRETRIAL ORDER. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 Case No.: 13-CV-521 YGR MICHAEL D. MORSHED, ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., Defendant. 9 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 10 The Case Management Conference currently set for Monday, July 15, 2013, is CONTINUED to 11 Monday, July 22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and believes the case 13 can proceed under the schedule set forth below. If these dates are acceptable to all parties, they may 14 file a JOINT Stipulation to the proposed dates by no later than Monday, July 15, 2013. Upon 15 receipt, the Court will confirm the dates in a separate order and the continued conference scheduled 16 for Monday, July 22, 2013, will be taken off calendar. If a JOINT Stipulation is not filed, the 17 conference will go forward as scheduled and the parties will be required to appear. 18 TENTATIVE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 19 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Monday, November 18, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. REFERRED TO ADR FOR COURT MEDIATION TO BE COMPLETED BY: October 31, 2013 LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS: July 31, 2013 NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: December 20, 2013 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED): Opening: November 15, 2013 Rebuttal: December 2, 2013 EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: December 20, 2013 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 TO BE HEARD BY: February 25, 2014 2 Friday, May 2, 2014 at 9:01 a.m. 3 COMPLIANCE HEARING (See PAGE 2) 4 JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT: May 2, 2014 5 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Friday, May 23, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 6 TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH: Monday, June 9, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. for 5 days Jury Trial 7 8 The Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases have significant requirements, including twenty-eight days in advance of the Pretrial Conference and to meet and confer at least twenty-one 11 (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. However, in certain cases, more time may be 12 Northern District of California various deadlines to prepare for trial. At a minimum, trial counsel are required to make exchanges 10 United States District Court 9 necessary to prepare in light of the complexities of the case. 13 A Compliance Hearing is set to confirm that counsel have timely met and conferred as 14 required by the Standing Pretrial Instructions Order and any specific such order for this action. Five 15 (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a Joint Statement 16 confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If 17 compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off 18 calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a Joint Statement in a 19 timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 20 21 Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures, as well as 22 Court’s Standing Order for Certain Employment Cases. All Standing Orders are available on the 23 Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: July 11, 2013 _______________________________________ 26 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?