GE Capital Information Technology Solution Inc. v. Carol H. Williams Advertising

Filing 21

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 18 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

OAKLAND DIVISION

4 GE CAPITAL INFORMATION

Case No: C 13-0606 SBA

TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.,
5

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

6

vs.

Docket 18

7

CAROL H. WILLIAMS ADVERTISING, a
8 California corporation.
9

Defendant.

10
11

The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend

12

to File First Amended Complaint. Dkt. 18. Plaintiff filed its motion on October 3, 2013.

13

Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), an opposition to a motion must be filed within fourteen days

14

of the date the motion was filed. More than fourteen days have elapsed since Plaintiff filed

15

its motion, and no opposition from Defendant, which is represented by counsel, has been

16

filed. The Court Standing Orders warn that the failure to timely oppose a motion will be

17

construed as a consent to the relief sought in the motion. Accordingly,

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend to File

19

First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall separately e-file the First

20

Amended Complaint within one day of the date this Order is filed. The parties are

21

reminded that under the Court’s Standing Orders, “[a]ll parties are required to meet and

22

confer before filing any motion or any non-stipulated request with this court, and to certify

23

that they have complied with this requirement.” Dkt. 10. This Order terminates Docket 18.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 1, 2013

______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge