Cards Against Humanity, LLC v. Loftek Technological Co., LLC et al

Filing 26

ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

CARDS AGAINST HUMANITY, LLC,

7
8
9
10

Case No.: 13-CV-0727 YGR
ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF
TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER

Plaintiff,
vs.
LOFTEK TECHNOLOGICAL CO., LLC,, et al.,
Defendants.

11

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

The Case Management Conference currently set for Monday, July 15, 2013, is CONTINUED to
13

Monday, July 22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.
14

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and believes the case
15

can proceed under the schedule set forth below. If these dates are acceptable to all parties, they may
16

file a JOINT Stipulation to the proposed dates by no later than Monday, July 15, 2013. Upon
17

receipt, the Court will confirm the dates in a separate order and the continued conference scheduled
18

for Monday, July 22, 2013, will be taken off calendar. If a JOINT Stipulation is not filed, the
19

conference will go forward as scheduled and the parties will be required to appear.
20
21

TENTATIVE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:

Monday, November 18, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.

REFERRED TO ADR FOR MANDATORY PRIVATE
MEDIATION TO BE COMPLETED BY:

August 31, 2013

LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:

July 31, 2013

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

February 7, 2014

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):

Opening: January 24, 2014
Rebuttal: February 7, 2014

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

February 28, 2014

2

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 TO BE HEARD BY:

March 11, 2014

3

Friday, May 9, 2014 at 9:01 a.m.

4

COMPLIANCE HEARING
(See PAGE 2)

5

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:

May 16, 2014

6

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:

Friday, May 30, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:

Monday, June 16, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. for 5
days
Jury Trial

7
8
9

The Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases have significant requirements, including

10

Northern District of California

various deadlines to prepare for trial. At a minimum, trial counsel are required to make exchanges

12
United States District Court

11

twenty-eight days in advance of the Pretrial Conference and to meet and confer at least twenty-one

13

(21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. However, in certain cases, more time may be

14

necessary to prepare in light of the complexities of the case.

15

A Compliance Hearing is set to confirm that counsel have timely met and conferred as

16

required by the Standing Pretrial Instructions Order and any specific such order for this action. Five

17

(5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a Joint Statement

18

confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If

19

compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off

20

calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a Joint Statement in a

21

timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.

22

The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing

23

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All Standing

24

Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: July 11, 2013
_______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28
1

See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment.
2