Lau v. Wong

Filing 12

ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO 5 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Responses due by 3/27/2013. Replies due by 4/3/2013. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/20/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 KAREN LAU, 5 6 7 Plaintiff, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. ERIC WONG, 8 9 No. C 13-763 CW Defendant. ________________________________/ On February 28, 2013, Defendant Eric Wang, erroneously sued 11 as Eric Wong, filed a motion to dismiss the claims asserted 12 against him by pro se Plaintiff Karen Lau. Docket No. 5. 13 served Plaintiff with the motion by mail. Docket No. 5-4. 14 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) and Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 6(a)(1)(C), Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion 16 was due by March 18, 2013. 17 He No opposition has been received. Within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall 18 respond to Defendant’s motion. 19 after Plaintiff’s response is filed. 20 decided on the papers. 21 Defendant shall reply seven days Defendant’s motion will be Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Order will result in 22 the dismissal of her claims against Defendant for failure to 23 prosecute. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: 3/20/2013 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?