Lau v. Wong
Filing
12
ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO 5 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Responses due by 3/27/2013. Replies due by 4/3/2013. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/20/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
KAREN LAU,
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
ORDER ADDRESSING
PLAINTIFF’S
RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
v.
ERIC WONG,
8
9
No. C 13-763 CW
Defendant.
________________________________/
On February 28, 2013, Defendant Eric Wang, erroneously sued
11
as Eric Wong, filed a motion to dismiss the claims asserted
12
against him by pro se Plaintiff Karen Lau.
Docket No. 5.
13
served Plaintiff with the motion by mail.
Docket No. 5-4.
14
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) and Federal Rule of Civil
15
Procedure 6(a)(1)(C), Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion
16
was due by March 18, 2013.
17
He
No opposition has been received.
Within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall
18
respond to Defendant’s motion.
19
after Plaintiff’s response is filed.
20
decided on the papers.
21
Defendant shall reply seven days
Defendant’s motion will be
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Order will result in
22
the dismissal of her claims against Defendant for failure to
23
prosecute.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: 3/20/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?