Hong et al v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 54

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting (53) in case 4:13-cv-00777-CW; (41) in case 4:13-cv-01029-CW; (42) in case 4:13-cv-01769-CW Stipulation to Continue. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WILLIAM C. MORISON (No. 99981)
[e-mail]
PHILIP D. WITTE (No. 112217)
[e-mail]
MORISON & PROUGH, LLP
2540 Camino Diablo, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CHARTIS SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SEONG HOON HONG, et al.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

16
17

YOUNG HO WON,

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
vs.
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

22
23

SEONG HOON HONG,

24
25
26
27
28
M ORISON &
P ROUGH , LLP

Plaintiff,
vs.
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C 13-777 CW
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER
TO FURTHER CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES (L.R.
6-2(a)); ORDER

Case No. C 13-1029 CW

Case No. C 13-1769 CW

-1STIPULATION TO FURTHER CONTINUE CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 13-777-CW; C 13-1029 CW; C 13-1769 CW

1

WHEREAS on November 15, 2013, the parties in the three captioned actions and the

2

related action captioned Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hong et al., Case No. C 12-

3

2658 CW, as well as a separate, related matter, reached a settlement in principle of those actions

4

and matters;

5
6

WHEREAS the parties have been diligently exchanging drafts of the settlement
agreements and negotiating numerous terms;

7

WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the issues, the number of parties involved (at least

8

13), and the number of law firms representing various parties (at least seven), the parties have not

9

yet found language for the settlement agreements acceptable to all parties;

10

WHEREAS, at the request of counsel for the parties, a conference call with the Hon.

11

James L. Warren (Ret.), who negotiated the settlement in principle, has been scheduled for

12

Tuesday, February 25, 2014 – the day before the scheduled Case Management Conference in this

13

case -- with counsel for all parties in the three coverage actions and counsel for the FDIC

14

participating, to attempt to reach agreement regarding the final terms of the settlement

15

agreements;

16
17

WHEREAS, the settlement of these actions and matters will obviate the need for case
management conferences;

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their designated

19

counsel that the case management conferences in the captioned actions currently scheduled for

20

February 26, 2014, be continued an additional 28 days to March 26, 2014, or other date suitable

21

for the Court, and that the parties must submit a Joint Case Management Statement or individual

22

Case Management Statements at least seven days before that date.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

M ORISON &
P ROUGH , LLP

-2STIPULATION TO FURTHER CONTINUE CM; [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 13-777-CW; C 13-1029 CW; C 13-1769 CW

1

Dated: February 25, 2014

2

Respectfully submitted,
MORISON & PROUGH, LLP

3
4

By: /s/ William C. Morison

5

Attorneys for Defendant
CHARTIS SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY

6
7

Hong et al. v. Chartis Specialty
Insurance Company, Case No.
C 13-777 CW; Hong v. Chartis
Specialty Insurance Company,
Case No. C 13-01769 CW; and
Won v. Chartis Specialty Insurance
Company, Case No. C 13-1029 CW

8
9
10
11

The undersigned have given authority to counsel for Chartis Specialty Insurance Company
12
to file this Stipulation Requesting Order To Further Continue Case Management Conferences.
13
14

Dated: February 25, 2014

KIM, SHAPIRO, PARK & LEE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

By: /s/ Steve E. Shapiro
Attorneys for Plaintiffs in the
Coverage Actions and Defendants
in the Underlying Action
DAVID CHIU, JUNG MIN MOK,
SANGCHOL AN, CHANG K.
CHANG, YONG OH CHOI,
TONY HUEY, JUNG KIM and
BHUPENDRA PATEL
Hong et al. v. Chartis Specialty
Insurance Company, Case No. C 13-777 CW

23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORISON &
P ROUGH , LLP

-3STIPULATION TO FURTHER CONTINUE CM; [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 13-777-CW; C 13-1029 CW; C 13-1769 CW

1

Dated: February 25, 2014

PARK & SYLVA

2
3

By: /s/ Daniel E. Park

4

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEONG HOON HONG

5

Hong v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company,
Case No. C 13-01769 CW

6
7
8

Dated: February 25, 2014

NASSIRI & JUNG, LLP

9
10

By: /s/ Kassra P. Nassiri

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
YOUNG HO WON

12

Won v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company,
Case No. C 13-1029 CW

13
14
15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED except that the case management

16

conference will be held on April 2, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.

17
18
19

2/25/2014
Dated: ______________

_______________________________________
United States District Court Judge

20
21
22

153225

23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORISON &
P ROUGH , LLP

-4STIPULATION TO FURTHER CONTINUE CM; [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 13-777-CW; C 13-1029 CW; C 13-1769 CW