Duenas et al v. Freitas et al
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 16 Motion for Leave to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 GERARD DUENAS, HAROLD GOLDMAN,
Case No: C 13-0836 SBA
In Pro Se,
ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PERMISSION FOR
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING
7
Plaintiffs,
8
vs.
9
STEVEN FREITAS, AKA STEVE FREITAS,
Dkt. 16
10 in his Official and Private Capacity,
SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
11 DEPARTMENT, KATHRYN STRALEY, in
her official and private capacity, DOES 1-15,
12 Inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court finds that Plaintiffs have not shown good cause to support their Motion
for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs’ Motion for Permission for Electronic
Case Filing is DENIED. This Order terminates Docket 16.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2013
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
GERARD DUENAS et al,
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN FREITAS et al,
Defendant.
/
9
10
Case Number: CV13-00836 SBA
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
12
13
14
15
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on March 29, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Gerard Duenas
6285 Sonoma Highway 12
Santa Rosa, CA 95409
Harold Goldman
6285 Highway 12
Santa Rosa, CA 95409
25
26
Dated: March 29, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
27
By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk
28
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?