Quintal Research Group, Inc. -v- Nintendo
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 63 Stipulation Changing Time re 43 Scheduling Order. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2014)
1
2
3
CHRISTIAN J. MARTINEZ (CA SBN 215360)
christian@redbridgelaw.net
665 3rd St., Suite 519
San Francisco California 94107
Telephone: (415)250-6677
Facsimile: (415)892-1521
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WILLIAM R. HILL (CA SBN 114954)
rock@donahue.com
CAROLYN E. BARRENO (CA SBN 267486)
carolyn@donahue.com
DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP
Attorneys at Law
1999 Harrison Street, 25th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612-3520
P.O. Box 12979
Oakland, CA 94604-2979
Telephone:
(510) 451-0544
Facsimile:
(510) 832-1486
GRANT E. KINSEL (CA SBN 172407)
gkinsel@perkinscoie.com
JOSEPH HAMILTON (CA SBN 211544)
jhamilton@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721
Telephone:
(310) 788-9900
Facsimile:
(310) 788-3399
Attorneys for Defendants
NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. and
NINTENDO CO., LTD.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
QUINTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
QUINTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC.,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
v.
Case No. 13-CV-0888 SBA
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING
TIME
NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. and
NINTENDO CO., LTD.,
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 13-CV-0888 SBA
1
2
3
4
The Court having considered the parties’ STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME, and for good cause shown,
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
following schedule shall apply to this action:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Date
Vacated for submission on
the papers.
Fourteen days from order
on MSJ
Forty-five days after
service of infringement
contentions
Fourteen days after
service of invalidity
contentions
Twenty-one days after
exchange of proposed
terms for construction
Sixty days after service of
invalidity contentions
Nature of Discovery/Event
Hearing regarding noninfringement of “symmetrically arranged”
limitation.
Disclosure of asserted claims and infringement contentions. Patent
L.R. 3-1, 3-2.
Disclosure of invalidity contentions. Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4.
Exchange of proposed terms for construction. Patent L.R. 4-1.
Exchange of preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic
evidence. Patent L.R. 4-2.
File joint claim construction and prehearing statement. Patent L.R.
4-3.
15
Deadline to amend pleading or join additional parties without leave
of the Court.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Thirty days after service
of claim construction and
prehearing statement
Forty-five days after
service of claim
construction and
prehearing statement
Fourteen days after
service of opening brief
with supporting evidence
regarding claim
construction
Fourteen days after
service of responsive brief
with supporting evidence
regarding claim
construction
Deadline to complete mediation.
Claim construction discovery completed. Patent L.R. 4-4.
Quintal to file and serve opening brief with supporting evidence
regarding claim construction. Patent L.R. 4-5(a).
Nintendo to file and serve responsive brief with supporting
evidence regarding claim construction. Patent L.R. 4-5(b).
Quintal to file and serve reply brief with supporting evidence
regarding claim construction. Patent L.R. 4-5(c).
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 13-CV-0888 SBA
1
2
Date
TBD
Nature of Discovery/Event
Claim construction hearing. Patent L.R. 4-6.
Case Management Conference to set remaining schedule.
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will enter a Scheduling Order concerning
the remaining deadlines at, or following, the Markman hearing in this matter.
6
7
8
Dated: 5/22/2014
_________________________________
Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 13-CV-0888 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?