Quintal Research Group, Inc. -v- Nintendo

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 63 Stipulation Changing Time re 43 Scheduling Order. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 CHRISTIAN J. MARTINEZ (CA SBN 215360) christian@redbridgelaw.net 665 3rd St., Suite 519 San Francisco California 94107 Telephone: (415)250-6677 Facsimile: (415)892-1521 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 WILLIAM R. HILL (CA SBN 114954) rock@donahue.com CAROLYN E. BARRENO (CA SBN 267486) carolyn@donahue.com DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP Attorneys at Law 1999 Harrison Street, 25th Floor Oakland, CA 94612-3520 P.O. Box 12979 Oakland, CA 94604-2979 Telephone: (510) 451-0544 Facsimile: (510) 832-1486 GRANT E. KINSEL (CA SBN 172407) gkinsel@perkinscoie.com JOSEPH HAMILTON (CA SBN 211544) jhamilton@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721 Telephone: (310) 788-9900 Facsimile: (310) 788-3399 Attorneys for Defendants NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. and NINTENDO CO., LTD. Attorneys for Plaintiff QUINTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 QUINTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, 18 19 20 v. Case No. 13-CV-0888 SBA ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. and NINTENDO CO., LTD., 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 13-CV-0888 SBA 1 2 3 4 The Court having considered the parties’ STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME, and for good cause shown, PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply to this action: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Date Vacated for submission on the papers. Fourteen days from order on MSJ Forty-five days after service of infringement contentions Fourteen days after service of invalidity contentions Twenty-one days after exchange of proposed terms for construction Sixty days after service of invalidity contentions Nature of Discovery/Event Hearing regarding noninfringement of “symmetrically arranged” limitation. Disclosure of asserted claims and infringement contentions. Patent L.R. 3-1, 3-2. Disclosure of invalidity contentions. Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4. Exchange of proposed terms for construction. Patent L.R. 4-1. Exchange of preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence. Patent L.R. 4-2. File joint claim construction and prehearing statement. Patent L.R. 4-3. 15 Deadline to amend pleading or join additional parties without leave of the Court. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Thirty days after service of claim construction and prehearing statement Forty-five days after service of claim construction and prehearing statement Fourteen days after service of opening brief with supporting evidence regarding claim construction Fourteen days after service of responsive brief with supporting evidence regarding claim construction Deadline to complete mediation. Claim construction discovery completed. Patent L.R. 4-4. Quintal to file and serve opening brief with supporting evidence regarding claim construction. Patent L.R. 4-5(a). Nintendo to file and serve responsive brief with supporting evidence regarding claim construction. Patent L.R. 4-5(b). Quintal to file and serve reply brief with supporting evidence regarding claim construction. Patent L.R. 4-5(c). 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 13-CV-0888 SBA 1 2 Date TBD Nature of Discovery/Event Claim construction hearing. Patent L.R. 4-6. Case Management Conference to set remaining schedule. 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will enter a Scheduling Order concerning the remaining deadlines at, or following, the Markman hearing in this matter. 6 7 8 Dated: 5/22/2014 _________________________________ Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 13-CV-0888 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?