Miller v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 10 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., Alexander Miller filed by Alexander Miller, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/13/13. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALEXANDER MILLER , Plaintiff(s), v. CASE NO. ______________________ C 13-00935 KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 120 days from the date of the order other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ May 7, 2013 ____________________________ /s/ Jocelyn Burton Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ May 7, 2013 ____________________________ /s/ Gregory Cheng Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 9 Dated: The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 5/13/13 __________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. DATED: May 8, 2013 By: /s/ Gregory C. Cheng Gregory C. Cheng When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?