Morazan v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc. et al
Filing
45
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Denying 38 Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing the Motion to Intervene (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
ANNE MARIE ESTEVEZ, FLA SBN 991694
(ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP
200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 5300
Miami, Florida 33131-2339
Telephone: (305) 415.3330
Facsimile: (877) 342.9652
aestevez@morganlewis.com
5
6
7
8
9
ERIC MECKLEY, SBN 168181
KATHRYN M. NAZARIAN, SBN 259392
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone:
415.442.1000
Facsimile:
415.442.1001
emeckley@morganlewis.com
knazarian@morganlewis.com
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
(erroneously sued as ARAMARK UNIFORM &
CAREER APPAREL GROUP, INC., ARAMARK
UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, INC., and
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC.)
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
MARTHA MORAZAN, individually, and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff,
vs.
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER
APPAREL GROUP, INC., a California
corporation; ARAMARK UNIFORM &
CAREER APPAREL, INC., a California
corporation; ARAMARK UNIFORM
SERVICES, INC., a California
corporation; ARAMARK UNIFORM &
CAREER APPAREL, LLC, a California
limited liability corporation; and DOES 120, inclusive,
Case No. 13-CV-00936-YGR
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING THE
MOTION TO INTERVENE OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF TEMPORARILY STAYING
MORAZAN MATTER UNTIL THE MOTION
TO INTERVENE HAS BEEN HEARD
Date: N.A.
Time: N.A.
Dept.: Courtroom 5
Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING
MOTION TO INTERVENE
Case No. 13-CV-00936-YGR
1
ORDER
2
3
The Court has considered Movants Mitch Marincovich and Ryan Compton’s (“Movants”)
4
Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing the Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative Administrative
5
Relief Temporarily Staying Morazan Matter until the Motion to Intervene has Been Heard (Dkt.
6
No. 38) and the briefing in opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 44), and good cause appearing therefore,
7
the Motion to Shorten Time is hereby DENIED.
8
9
The briefing on the Motion to Intervene shall proceed pursuant to the Civil Local Rules,
and the hearing remains on calendar as previously noticed on August 13, 2013.
10
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 38.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: July 15, 2013
14
Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING
MOTION TO INTERVENE
Case No. 13-CV-00936-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?