Colaco et al v. The Asic Advantage Simplefied Employee Pension Plan et al
Filing
152
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 151 Stipulation Dismissing Entire Action with Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2018)
1
2
3
4
KATHRYN C. CURRY (SBN 157099)
TRACY M. TIERNEY (SBN 200537)
GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Ste 400
Mountain View, CA 94040
Telephone:
(650) 428-3900
Email:
kcurry@gcalaw.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
10
Mountain View, California
GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP
9
JOHN B. STEPHENS (SBN 142718)
TIMOTHY A. SPIVEY (SBN 269084)
STEPHENS FRIEDLAND LLP
2603 Main Street, Suite 350
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 468-3200
Facsimile: (949) 468-3201
11
12
Attorney for Defendants
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
STEPHEN COLACO, TOM GAMMON,
SRIVALLI CHANDRA, DONALD
HUMBERT, TERRY JONES, QUY LAU,
DAVID LICHTENSTEIN, SINA MA,
MICHAEL MULLEN, TRINH NGUYEN,
AMAADUDDIN QURAISHI, DAVID
ROBERTSON, STEPHEN THOMAS,
NHAN TRAN, AND MODDY WONG
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. 4:13-cv-00972 HSG
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed.R.Civ.P 41(a)(1)]
[Filed concurrently with Stipulation]
v.
THE ASIC ADVANTAGE SIMPLIFIED
EMPLOYEE PENSION PLAN, ASIC
ADVANTAGE INC., AND MICROSEMI
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
27
28
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – CASE NO. 13-CV-00972 HSG
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in
2
its entirety with prejudice as to all parties. All parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and
3
costs.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: July 9, 2018
________________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
10
Mountain View, California
GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE– CASE NO. 13-CV-00972 HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?