Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER re 31 Response ( Non Motion ), filed by Tommy Jay Carter. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/10/2013. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
TRICIA M. BARTELT,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
ORDER
AFFYMAX, INC., et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 13-1025 PJH
Defendants.
____________________________/
12
13
Plaintiffs Frank Estrada and Christopher Sprute each having withdrawn his motion
14
for appointment as lead plaintiff and for appointment of lead plaintiff’s counsel, and plaintiff
15
Tommy Jay Carter having previously moved for, among other things, appointment as lead
16
plaintiff and for appointment of lead plaintiff’s counsel, and having also requested entry of
17
an order by the court granting that motion,
18
It is hereby Ordered that the parties shall, no later than May 17, 2013, submit a
19
stipulated form of order, including the relief requested by plaintiff Carter in the response
20
filed May 10, 2013, plus a schedule for filing the amended complaint and for defendants to
21
respond to the amended complaint.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: May 10, 2013
25
26
27
28
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?