Arko v. Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Moor South/Pier Management Co. L.P. et al

Filing 26

TENTATIVE SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 Case No.: 13-CV-01044-YGR FRED C. ARKO, Plaintiff, TENTATIVE SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF MOOR + SOUTH/PIER MANAGEMENT CO., L.P., PLAN NUMBER 502, MOOR + SOUTH/PIER MANAGEMENT CO., L.P., HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 14 15 16 The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for Monday, July 15, 2013 is hereby CONTINUED to Monday, July 22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. 17 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and believes the case 18 can proceed under the schedule set forth below. If these dates are acceptable to all parties, they may 19 file a Joint Stipulation to the proposed dates by no later than Monday, July 15, 2013. Upon receipt, 20 the Court will confirm the dates in a separate order and the continued Case Management Conference 21 will be taken off calendar. If a Joint Stipulation is not filed, the conference will go forward as 22 scheduled and the parties will be required to appear. If the parties wish to appear on July 22 to 23 discuss the schedule below, the Court requests that the parties file a joint notice so stating. TENTATIVE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 24 25 MEDIATION CUT-OFF: November 15, 2013 26 DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: January 31, 2014 27 MOTION FILING CUT-OFF/OPENING TRIAL BRIEFS: February 28, 2014 RESPONSIVE TRIAL BRIEFS: March 31, 2014 28 1 HEARING: 2 April 22, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. The Court anticipates that at the scheduled hearing, it may seek to substantively discuss 3 issues raised in the parties’ trial briefs or, if appropriate, schedule the date for the bench trial at that 4 time. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: July 11, 2013 __________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?