Arko v. Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Moor South/Pier Management Co. L.P. et al

Filing 26

TENTATIVE SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13

Case No.: 13-CV-01044-YGR

FRED C. ARKO,
Plaintiff,

TENTATIVE SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

vs.
GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
FOR EMPLOYEES OF MOOR +
SOUTH/PIER MANAGEMENT CO., L.P.,
PLAN NUMBER 502, MOOR +
SOUTH/PIER MANAGEMENT CO., L.P.,
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.

14
15
16

The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for Monday, July 15, 2013 is hereby
CONTINUED to Monday, July 22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

17

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and believes the case

18

can proceed under the schedule set forth below. If these dates are acceptable to all parties, they may

19

file a Joint Stipulation to the proposed dates by no later than Monday, July 15, 2013. Upon receipt,

20

the Court will confirm the dates in a separate order and the continued Case Management Conference

21

will be taken off calendar. If a Joint Stipulation is not filed, the conference will go forward as

22

scheduled and the parties will be required to appear. If the parties wish to appear on July 22 to

23

discuss the schedule below, the Court requests that the parties file a joint notice so stating.
TENTATIVE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

24
25

MEDIATION CUT-OFF:

November 15, 2013

26

DISCOVERY CUT-OFF:

January 31, 2014

27

MOTION FILING CUT-OFF/OPENING TRIAL BRIEFS:

February 28, 2014

RESPONSIVE TRIAL BRIEFS:

March 31, 2014

28

1

HEARING:

2

April 22, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

The Court anticipates that at the scheduled hearing, it may seek to substantively discuss

3

issues raised in the parties’ trial briefs or, if appropriate, schedule the date for the bench trial at that

4

time.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: July 11, 2013

__________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2