Leonberger v. Wells Fargo Bank et al

Filing 32

ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 LIDIA LEONBERGER, 7 Plaintiff, No. C 13-1114 PJH 8 v. 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES WELLS FARGO BANK, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Defendants. _______________________________/ 12 13 Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs came on 14 for hearing before this court on November 13, 2013. Plaintiff Lidia Leonberger (“plaintiff”) 15 did not appear at the hearing, nor did she file an opposition to Wells Fargo’s motion. Wells 16 Fargo appeared telephonically through its counsel, Viddell Heard. Having read the papers 17 filed in conjunction with the motion and carefully considered the arguments and the relevant 18 legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS Wells Fargo’s motion 19 for attorneys’ fees and costs for the reasons stated in the hearing and as follows. 20 As Wells Fargo points out, both it and plaintiff were parties to contracts that included 21 attorneys’ fees provisions (specifically, the note and the deed of trust). California Civil 22 Code § 1717 states that, “where the contract specifically provides that attorney’s fees and 23 costs, which are incurred to enforce that contract, shall be awarded,” then the prevailing 24 party “shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees.” The court, like other courts in this 25 district, finds that section 1717's “shall be entitled” language makes the fee award 26 mandatory. See, e.g., Omega v. Wells Fargo, 2012 WL 2249820, at *3 (N.D. Cal. June 15, 27 2012) (citing Hsu v. Abarra, 9 Cal.4th 863, 872 (1995)). Accordingly, the court GRANTS 28 Wells Fargo’s motion, and awards it $9,725 in fees and costs. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: November 13, 2013 3 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?