Leonberger v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
LIDIA LEONBERGER,
7
Plaintiff,
No. C 13-1114 PJH
8
v.
9
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
WELLS FARGO BANK, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Defendants.
_______________________________/
12
13
Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs came on
14
for hearing before this court on November 13, 2013. Plaintiff Lidia Leonberger (“plaintiff”)
15
did not appear at the hearing, nor did she file an opposition to Wells Fargo’s motion. Wells
16
Fargo appeared telephonically through its counsel, Viddell Heard. Having read the papers
17
filed in conjunction with the motion and carefully considered the arguments and the relevant
18
legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS Wells Fargo’s motion
19
for attorneys’ fees and costs for the reasons stated in the hearing and as follows.
20
As Wells Fargo points out, both it and plaintiff were parties to contracts that included
21
attorneys’ fees provisions (specifically, the note and the deed of trust). California Civil
22
Code § 1717 states that, “where the contract specifically provides that attorney’s fees and
23
costs, which are incurred to enforce that contract, shall be awarded,” then the prevailing
24
party “shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees.” The court, like other courts in this
25
district, finds that section 1717's “shall be entitled” language makes the fee award
26
mandatory. See, e.g., Omega v. Wells Fargo, 2012 WL 2249820, at *3 (N.D. Cal. June 15,
27
2012) (citing Hsu v. Abarra, 9 Cal.4th 863, 872 (1995)). Accordingly, the court GRANTS
28
Wells Fargo’s motion, and awards it $9,725 in fees and costs.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: November 13, 2013
3
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?