THX, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 382

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 379 Stipulation REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE INC.S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE (DKT NOS. 367 , 369 , 371 ). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2017) Modified on 10/6/2017 to correct typo (ndrS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Eric L. Wesenberg, Bar No. 139696
[e-mail]
Christopher L. Kelley, Bar No. 166608
[e-mail]
Victoria Q. Smith, Bar No. 236045
[e-mail]
Andrew N. Klein, Bar No. 300221
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Kenneth J. Halpern, Bar No. 187663
[e-mail]
STRIS & MAHER LLP
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1830
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Mark D. Selwyn, Bar No. 244180
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Nina S. Tallon (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
18

SLOT SPEAKER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

19
20
21

Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC.,

22

Case No. 4:13-cv-01161-HSG (DMR)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION
TO BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE
INC.’S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE (DKTS.
367, 369, 371)

Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
137121085.1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Briefing for
Apple’s Motions to Exclude (Dkts. 367, 369, 371)
No.: 4:13-cv-01161-HSG (DMR)

1

Pursuant to L.R. 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Slot

2

Speaker Technologies, Inc. (“SST”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively, the

3

“Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, as follows:

4

WHEREAS, the Parties request that the briefing schedule for Apple’s Motions to Exclude

5

the Expert Opinions of Michael Dansky, Erin MacDonald, and Nisha Mody (Dkts. 367, 369, and

6

371, collectively, “Apple’s Motions to Exclude”) be extended by one week for SST’s oppositions

7

and by 9 days for Apple’s replies;

8
9

WHEREAS, the Parties’ requested modification to the briefing schedule does not affect
any other dates specified in the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 219), or the deadlines for opposition and

10

reply to the parties’ dispositive motions (Dkts. 358 and 361) and Apple’s Motion to Strike

11

Opinions of Dr. Stephen Elliott (Dkt. 356, “Apple’s Motion to Strike”);

12

WHEREAS, the Parties have previously requested no other modifications to the

13

Scheduling Order, except for their May 10, 2017 request regarding an extension of time to

14

conduct certain depositions, which the Court granted (Dkt. 319), their June 21, 2017 request

15

regarding an extension of time to serve expert reports, which the Court granted (Dkt. 345), and

16

their August 31, 2017 request regarding a one-week extension to complete expert discovery,

17

which the Court granted (Dkt. 351); and

18

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully submit that there is good cause to modify the existing

19

briefing schedule for Apple’s Motions to Exclude, in view of the complexity of the issues

20

presented in the parties’ dispositive motions, Apple’s Motion to Strike, and Apple’s Motions to

21

Exclude, in view of the oppositions and replies to the aforementioned motions being currently due

22

on the same two days, and in view of the requested extension having no effect on the November

23

9, 2017 hearing date for the aforementioned motions.

24

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties that

25

subject to the Court’s approval, SST’s oppositions to Apple’s Motions to Exclude must be filed

26

by October 23, 2017, and Apple’s replies thereto must be filed by November 2, 2017.

27
28
137121085.1

-1-

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Briefing for
Apple’s Motions to Exclude (Dkts. 367, 369, 371)
No.: 4:13-cv-01161-HSG (DMR)

1

The Parties also respectfully request that the Court issue an order granting the relief

2

requested.

3

DATED: October 5, 2017

By:

4
5

Attorney for Plaintiff
Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc.

6
7

DATED: October 5, 2017

By:

8
9
10

/s/ Nina S. Tallon
Nina S. Tallon
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
Attorney for Defendant Apple Inc.

11
***

12
13

/s/ Victoria Smith
Victoria Q. Smith
PERKINS COIE LLP

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, SST’s oppositions to Apple’s Motions to Exclude

14

(Dkts. 367, 369, 371) must be filed by October 23, 2017, and Apple’s replies thereto must be filed

15

by November 2, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED.
RED.

16

Dated: ______________
10/6/2017

17

___________________________________
________ ___ ____ _____
_____________ ___________ _______
_ _
_ ____
_
_____ _____
_____
Haywood Gilliam,
Hon. Hay
Ho Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
d
il l
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
137121085.1

-2-

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Briefing for
Apple’s Motions to Exclude (Dkts. 367, 369, 371)
No.: 4:13-cv-01161-HSG (DMR)