Gilbert v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Filing
426
ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COURT SHOULD CONSIDER OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/21/17. Show Cause Response due by 8/25/2017.(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
SE
EAN L. GIL
LBERT, et al
l.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
MONEYMUT
M
TUAL, LLC et al.,
C,
Case No. 1
13-cv-01171
1-JSW
ORDER T DEFEND
TO
DANTS TO SHOW
O
CAUSE W
WHY COUR SHOULD
RT
D
CONSIDE OBJECT
ER
TIONS TO
EVIDENC
CE
Dkt. No. 42
24
Defendants
s.
12
13
On Aug 18, 2017 Defendan filed their reply in sup
gust
7,
nts
r
pport of thei motion for summary
ir
r
14
jud
dgment. Def
fendants also filed objections to the e
o
evidence sub
bmitted by P
Plaintiffs. U
Under
15
No
orthern Distri Civil Loc Rule 7-3( “[a]ny e
ict
cal
(c),
evidentiary a procedur objection to the
and
ral
ns
16
opp
position mus be contain within th reply brief or memora
st
ned
he
f
andum.” Defendants did not comply
d
y
17
wit that rule. Accordingly the Court HEREBY O
th
y,
ORDERS De
efendants to show cause why the
18
Court should consider the objections. Defendants’ response to this Order t Show Cau shall be
o
D
’
o
to
use
19
due by August 25, 2017.
e
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: August 21, 2017
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?