Ang et al v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

Filing 184

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 182 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney David William Skaar terminated. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BAKER MCKENZIE Mark C. Goodman (Bar No. 154692) 2 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1100 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-3000 Facsimile: (415) 576-3099 mark.goodman@bakermckenzie.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP David W. Skaar (Bar No. 265377) 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 785-4600 Facsimile: (310) 785-4701 david.skaar@hoganlovells.com 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 Alex Ang and Lynn Streit, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 13-CV-01196-HSG (NC) v. ORDER RELIEVING DAVID W. SKAAR OF HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., Judge: 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 19 Defendant. 20 21 [Filed concurrently with: Notice of Withdrawal of David W. Skaar of Hogan Lovells US LLP as Counsel for Defendant Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OGAN L OVELLS US LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES ORDER 13-CV-01196-HSG (NC) 1 Pursua to Defend Bimbo Bakeries US Inc.’s (“ ant dant SA, “BBUSA”) r request and L Local Rules 2 5-1(c)(2)(E) an 11-5(a), the Court he nd t ereby relieve David W. Skaar (Bar N 265377) of Hogan es No. ) 3 ovells US LL as counse of record for BBUSA. LP el f Lo . 4 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. 5 6 7 ated: April 12, 2018 Da __________ _ ___________ __________ ___________ ____ Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr . S. r. U.S. District Cou Judge urt 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OGAN L OV VELLS US LLP P ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES ORDE ER 13-CV-0 01196-HSG (NC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?