Ang et al v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

Filing 240

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 239 SCHEDULING STIPULATION. Motions due by 6/17/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN 128515) PRATT & ASSOCIATES 634 North Santa Cruz Avenue Suite 204 Los Gatos, CA 95030 Telephone: (408) 806-4600 pgore@prattattorneys.com Keith M. Fleischman (admitted pro hac vice) Joshua D. Glatter (admitted pro hac vice) FLEISCHMAN BONNER & ROCCO, LLP 81 Main Street, Suite 515 White Plains, New York 10601 Telephone: (914) 278-5100 Fax: (917) 591-5245 kfleischman@fbrllp.com jglatter@fbrllp.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 15 Mark C. Goodman (SBN 154692) mark.goodman@bakermckenzie.com Anne Kelts Assayag (SBN 298710) anne.assayag@bakermckenzie.com BAKER & McKENZIE LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-3000 Facsimile: (415) 576-3099 16 Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 ALEX ANG and LYNNE STREIT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. Case No. 4:13-CV-1196-HSG SCHEDULING STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Action Filed: March 18, 2013 24 25 26 BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., Defendant. 27 28 JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:13-CV-01196-HSG 1 Pursuant to Northern District Rule 6-1(b), and subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiffs 2 Alex Ang and Lynne Streit (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Bimbo Bakeries U.S.A., Inc. 3 (“BBUSA”) (collectively “the Parties”) respectfully submit the following Scheduling Stipulation 4 and proposed Order. 5 WHEREAS, on April 28, 2020, the Court granted preliminary approval of settlement in 6 the above-captioned action (“Preliminary Approval Order,” ECF No. 236); 7 WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiffs are presently preparing a joint motion for final 8 approval of settlement agreement and attorneys’ fees (“Final Approval Motion”) for review and 9 comment by BBUSA’s counsel; 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel’s preparation of the Final Approval Motion has taken 11 slightly longer than originally anticipated; 12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, the Parties are presently 13 scheduled to submit the Final Approval Motion on June 10, 2020, with objections due on July 24, 14 2020, and a final hearing to consider the Final Approval Motion scheduled for August 27, 2020; 15 WHEREAS, BBUSA’s counsel does not object to Plaintiffs’ counsel requesting that, 16 subject to the Court’s approval, the Final Approval Motion submission date be extended to June 17 17, 2020; 18 WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed that, subject to the Court’s approval, the date 19 to submit objections to the Final Approval Motion be extended to July 31, 2020 in light of the 20 preceding requested extension; 21 WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed that, subject to the Court’s approval, they shall 22 either: (1) issue updated announcements on Plaintiffs’ counsel’s and BBUSA’s websites advising 23 that the time to submit objections has been extended to July 31, 2020 (which Plaintiff shall draft 24 and submit to BBUSA’s counsel for its approval); or (2) revise the existing notice language on 25 their websites to reflect the updated dates; 26 WHEREAS, if the Court so directs, the Parties have further agreed that Plaintiffs’ counsel 27 shall also issue a press release advising of the scheduling change; 28 JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:13-CV-01196-HSG 1 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties reasonably anticipate these modest scheduling 2 adjustments will not require adjourning the currently-scheduled August 27, 2020 hearing for the 3 Final Approval Motion, subject to the Court’s preferences; and 4 5 WHEREAS, this is the first request for an adjustment of the final approval schedule set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order. 6 Subject to the Court’s approval, the Parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court: 7 (1) grant Plaintiffs’ request to extend the time to submit the Final Approval Motion from June 10, 8 2020 to June 17, 2020; and (2) extend the time to file any objections to the Final Approval Motion 9 from July 24, 2020 to July 31, 2020. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: June 4, 2020 /s/ Pierce Gore Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN 128515) PRATT & ASSOCIATES 634 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite 204 Los Gatos, CA 95030 Telephone: (408) 806-4600 Fax: (408) 369-0752 pgore@prattattorneys.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Mark C. Goodman Mark C. Goodman (Bar No. 154692) BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1100 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-3000 Facsimile: (415) 576-3099 mark.goodman@bakermckenzie.com 21 Attorneys for Defendant BBUSA 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:13-CV-01196-HSG 2 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the accompanying Scheduling Stipulation; [Proposed] Order, and good cause 3 appearing therefor, the Court hereby: (1) extends the parties’ time to submit the Final Approval 4 Motion from June 10, 2020 until June 17, 2020; and (2) extends the time to file any objections to 5 the Final Approval Motion from July 24, 2020 to July 31, 2020. 6 Dated: June ___, 2020 6/5/2020 7 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:13-CV-01196-HSG 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?