Pratt v. Gower
Filing
37
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on May 20, 2015. Supplemental briefs due June 5, 2015.(ygrlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
DANELL L. PRATT,
Case No. 13-cv-01225-YGR
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
6
7
B. GOWER, Warden,
Re: Dkt. No. 1
Defendant.
8
9
Regarding Danell Pratt’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1), the parties shall
file supplemental briefs of no more than eight (8) pages each by June 5, 2015, addressing the
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
following issue:
12
In his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of California, the Petitioner
13
raised four grounds for the relief sought: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) in
14
connection with his counsel’s opening statement; (2) IAC for failure to impeach prosecution
15
witnesses; (3) IAC for failure to present third-party culpability evidence; and (4) complete denial
16
of counsel. (Dkt. No. 24-2, Ex. I.) The Petitioner listed Grounds 1 and 2 within the appropriate
17
boxes of the MC-275 petition for writ of habeas corpus state form. (Id.) The additional Grounds
18
3 and 4 were listed separately in an attachment to the form. (Id.) The state court’s order denying
19
the petition specifically references the first two grounds, included on the form, but makes no
20
mention of the last two, included on the attachment. (Dkt. No. 24-2, Ex. J.) In light of these
21
unusual circumstances, suggesting the state court may have overlooked the grounds listed on the
22
attachment to the petition form, the supplemental briefing shall address whether or not the Court
23
should apply a de novo standard of review as to those unmentioned grounds. See, e.g., Johnson v.
24
Williams, 133 S. Ct. 1088, 1091 (2013).
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 20, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?