Pratt v. Gower

Filing 37

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on May 20, 2015. Supplemental briefs due June 5, 2015.(ygrlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DANELL L. PRATT, Case No. 13-cv-01225-YGR Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 6 7 B. GOWER, Warden, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant. 8 9 Regarding Danell Pratt’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1), the parties shall file supplemental briefs of no more than eight (8) pages each by June 5, 2015, addressing the 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 following issue: 12 In his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of California, the Petitioner 13 raised four grounds for the relief sought: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) in 14 connection with his counsel’s opening statement; (2) IAC for failure to impeach prosecution 15 witnesses; (3) IAC for failure to present third-party culpability evidence; and (4) complete denial 16 of counsel. (Dkt. No. 24-2, Ex. I.) The Petitioner listed Grounds 1 and 2 within the appropriate 17 boxes of the MC-275 petition for writ of habeas corpus state form. (Id.) The additional Grounds 18 3 and 4 were listed separately in an attachment to the form. (Id.) The state court’s order denying 19 the petition specifically references the first two grounds, included on the form, but makes no 20 mention of the last two, included on the attachment. (Dkt. No. 24-2, Ex. J.) In light of these 21 unusual circumstances, suggesting the state court may have overlooked the grounds listed on the 22 attachment to the petition form, the supplemental briefing shall address whether or not the Court 23 should apply a de novo standard of review as to those unmentioned grounds. See, e.g., Johnson v. 24 Williams, 133 S. Ct. 1088, 1091 (2013). 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 20, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?