SAP America, Inc. v. Pi-Net International, Inc.
Filing
103
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/2/2019. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SAP AMERICA, INC.,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
Case No. 13-cv-01248-PJH
JUDGMENT
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,
Defendant.
12
13
14
The issues having been duly heard and the court having granted plaintiff’s motion
for summary judgment,
15
it is Ordered and Adjudged
16
that judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff on all of defendant’s
17
counterclaims of infringement of the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,037,158 (“the
18
’158 Patent), 5,987,500 (“the ’500 Patent”) and 8,108,492 (“the ’492 Patent”), and against
19
defendant on the same; and
20
that judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff on its claims for declaratory
21
judgment of non-infringement of the ’158 Patent, the ’500 Patent, and the ’492 Patent,
22
and against defendant on the same.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 2, 2019
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?