SAP America, Inc. v. Pi-Net International, Inc.

Filing 103

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/2/2019. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAP AMERICA, INC., 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. Case No. 13-cv-01248-PJH JUDGMENT LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Defendant. 12 13 14 The issues having been duly heard and the court having granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, 15 it is Ordered and Adjudged 16 that judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff on all of defendant’s 17 counterclaims of infringement of the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,037,158 (“the 18 ’158 Patent), 5,987,500 (“the ’500 Patent”) and 8,108,492 (“the ’492 Patent”), and against 19 defendant on the same; and 20 that judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff on its claims for declaratory 21 judgment of non-infringement of the ’158 Patent, the ’500 Patent, and the ’492 Patent, 22 and against defendant on the same. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 2, 2019 __________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?