ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 220

ORDER GRANTING, AS MODIFIED, 211 Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Filing of Defendants' Opposition and Filing of Plaintiffs' Reply to Opposition re 202 Motion to Dismiss and CONTINUING hearing. Opposition due by 9/4/2014. Reply due by 9/15/2014. Motion Hearing set for 10/3/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 26, 2014. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)

Download PDF
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 Michael W. De Vries michael.devries@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 Attorneys for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. and Linksys LLC f/k/a/ Cisco Consumer Products LLC 6 7 8 9 Robert Walters McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 500 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 rwalters@mwe.com T: 202-756-8000 F: 202-756-8087 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Co. ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 ChriMar Systems Inc., et al., Case No. 4:13-cv-01300-JSW 17 Plaintiff, 18 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR: v. 19 Cisco Systems Inc., et al., 20 (1) DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND Defendants. 21 (2) PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS 22 23 [Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2] 24 Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time for Motion to Dismiss Opp and Reply Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page2 of 6 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties file this Stipulation respectfully requesting a 2 brief enlargement of time for: (1) the filing deadline for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Linksys 3 LLC, (collectively, “Cisco”) and Hewlett-Packard Co.’s (“HP”) Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion 4 to Dismiss Defendants HP and Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and 5 HP’s Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202); and (2) the filing deadline for 6 Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company LLC’s 7 (collectively, “ChriMar”) Reply to Defendants’ Opposition. This request is supported by good 8 cause and will not affect any other deadlines in this case, as further addressed in the attached 9 Declaration of Brian Paul Gearing. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the parties that, subject to the approval of the Court: 1. The filing deadline for Defendants’ Opposition to ChriMar’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 202) shall be extended from August 29, 2014 to September 4, 2014. 2. The filing deadline for ChriMar’s Reply to Defendants’ Opposition regarding Dkt. No. 202 shall be extended from September 5, 2014 to September 15, 2014. 3. The noticed hearing date and time of September 26, 2014 at 9:00 am for this motion shall not change, and these extensions will not impact any other deadline in the case. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: August 21, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 20 By: /s/ Michael W. De Vries 21 Michael W. De Vries KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 22 23 24 Steven Cherny (Pro Hac Vice) James E. Marina (Pro Hac Vice) Brian Paul Gearing (Pro Hac Vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply 2 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page3 of 6 2 Attorneys for Defendants Cisco Systems Inc. and Linksys LLC f/k/a/ Cisco Consumer Products LLC 3 McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 4 By: /s/ Robert J. Walters______ 5 David H. Dolkas (SBN: 111080 ) Darryl J. Ong (SBN: 286621) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 ddolkas@mwe.com djong@mwe.com T: 650-815-7400 F:650-815-7401 1 6 7 8 9 Robert J. Walters (Pro Hac Vice) Charles J. Hawkins (Pro Hac Vice) Raymond M. Gabriel (Pro Hac Vice) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 500 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 rwalters@mwe.com chawkins@mwe.com rgabriel@mwe.com T: 202-756-8000 F: 202-756-8087 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Co. 16 17 18 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN 19 By: /s/ Brandon Jordan 20 Courtland Reichman MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650)-394-1045 Facsimile: (650)-394-1422 creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com 21 22 23 24 25 Robert Auchter (PRO HAC VICE) Benjamin Levi (PRO HAC VICE) Dirk Thomas (PRO HAC VICE) Jeffrey Frey (PRO HAC VICE) Brandon Jordan (PRO HAC VICE) Alice Suh (PRO HAC VICE) 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply 3 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page4 of 6 Joshua Morris (PRO HAC VICE) McKool Smith P.C. 1999 K Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 370-8300 Facsimile: (202) 370-8344 rauchter@mckoolsmith.com blevi@mckoolsmith.com dthomas@mckoolsmith.com jfrey@mckoolsmith.com bjordan@mckoolsmith.com asuh@mckoolsmith.com jmorris@mckoolsmith.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply 4 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page5 of 6 1 Pursuant to the Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 2 perjury that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from all parties’ 3 counsel. 4 Dated: August 21, 2014 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 5 /s/ Michael W. De Vries 6 Michael W. De Vries KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Cisco Systems, Inc. and Linksys LLC f/k/a/ Cisco Consumer Products LLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply 5 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page6 of 6 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 1. 3 4 5 The filing deadline for Defendants’ Opposition to ChriMar’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 202) shall be extended from August 29, 2014 to September 4, 2014. 2. The filing deadline for ChriMar’s Reply to Defendants’ Opposition regarding Dkt. No. 202 shall be extended from September 5, 2014 to September 15, 2014. The hearing is CONTINUED to October 3, 2014. 6 7 August 26, 2014 Dated: _____________________ By:_________________________________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply 6 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?