ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 220

ORDER GRANTING, AS MODIFIED, 211 Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Filing of Defendants' Opposition and Filing of Plaintiffs' Reply to Opposition re 202 Motion to Dismiss and CONTINUING hearing. Opposition due by 9/4/2014. Reply due by 9/15/2014. Motion Hearing set for 10/3/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 26, 2014. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)

Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5

Michael W. De Vries
[e-mail]
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. and
Linksys LLC f/k/a/ Cisco Consumer Products LLC

6
7
8
9

Robert Walters
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
[e-mail]
T: 202-756-8000
F: 202-756-8087

10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
Hewlett-Packard Co.
ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON
SIGNATURE PAGE

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

OAKLAND DIVISION

16
ChriMar Systems Inc., et al.,

Case No. 4:13-cv-01300-JSW

17
Plaintiff,
18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ENLARGE TIME FOR:

v.
19
Cisco Systems Inc., et al.,
20

(1) DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTERCLAIMS AND

Defendants.
21

(2) PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO
DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTERCLAIMS

22
23

[Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2]
24
Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge
Time for Motion to Dismiss Opp and Reply

Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page2 of 6

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties file this Stipulation respectfully requesting a

2

brief enlargement of time for: (1) the filing deadline for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Linksys

3

LLC, (collectively, “Cisco”) and Hewlett-Packard Co.’s (“HP”) Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion

4

to Dismiss Defendants HP and Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and

5

HP’s Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202); and (2) the filing deadline for

6

Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company LLC’s

7

(collectively, “ChriMar”) Reply to Defendants’ Opposition. This request is supported by good

8

cause and will not affect any other deadlines in this case, as further addressed in the attached

9

Declaration of Brian Paul Gearing.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the
parties that, subject to the approval of the Court:
1.

The filing deadline for Defendants’ Opposition to ChriMar’s Motion to Dismiss

(Dkt. No. 202) shall be extended from August 29, 2014 to September 4, 2014.
2.

The filing deadline for ChriMar’s Reply to Defendants’ Opposition regarding Dkt.

No. 202 shall be extended from September 5, 2014 to September 15, 2014.
3.

The noticed hearing date and time of September 26, 2014 at 9:00 am for this

motion shall not change, and these extensions will not impact any other deadline in the case.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: August 21, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

20

By: /s/ Michael W. De Vries

21

Michael W. De Vries
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

22
23
24

Steven Cherny (Pro Hac Vice)
James E. Marina (Pro Hac Vice)
Brian Paul Gearing (Pro Hac Vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time
for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply

2

Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page3 of 6

2

Attorneys for Defendants
Cisco Systems Inc. and Linksys LLC f/k/a/
Cisco Consumer Products LLC

3

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

4

By: /s/ Robert J. Walters______

5

David H. Dolkas (SBN: 111080 )
Darryl J. Ong (SBN: 286621)
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
T: 650-815-7400
F:650-815-7401

1

6
7
8
9

Robert J. Walters (Pro Hac Vice)
Charles J. Hawkins (Pro Hac Vice)
Raymond M. Gabriel (Pro Hac Vice)
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
T: 202-756-8000
F: 202-756-8087

10
11
12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendant
Hewlett-Packard Co.

16
17
18

MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN

19
By: /s/ Brandon Jordan

20

Courtland Reichman
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (650)-394-1422
[e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25

Robert Auchter (PRO HAC VICE)
Benjamin Levi (PRO HAC VICE)
Dirk Thomas (PRO HAC VICE)
Jeffrey Frey (PRO HAC VICE)
Brandon Jordan (PRO HAC VICE)
Alice Suh (PRO HAC VICE)

26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time
for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply

3

Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page4 of 6
Joshua Morris (PRO HAC VICE)
McKool Smith P.C.
1999 K Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems
Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar
Holding Company, LLC

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time
for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply

4

Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page5 of 6

1

Pursuant to the Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

2

perjury that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from all parties’

3

counsel.

4

Dated: August 21, 2014

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

5

/s/ Michael W. De Vries

6

Michael W. De Vries
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Cisco Systems, Inc.
and Linksys LLC f/k/a/ Cisco
Consumer Products LLC

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time
for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply

5

Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document211 Filed08/21/14 Page6 of 6

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

1.

3
4
5

The filing deadline for Defendants’ Opposition to ChriMar’s Motion to Dismiss

(Dkt. No. 202) shall be extended from August 29, 2014 to September 4, 2014.
2.

The filing deadline for ChriMar’s Reply to Defendants’ Opposition regarding Dkt.

No. 202 shall be extended from September 5, 2014 to September 15, 2014.
The hearing is CONTINUED to October 3, 2014.

6
7

August 26, 2014
Dated: _____________________

By:_________________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Enlarge Time
for Motion to Dismiss Opposition and Reply

6

Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW