ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filing
222
ORDER GRANTING 221 Stipulation to Continue Hearing on 202 Motion to Dismiss Defendants HP and Cisco's Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP's Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim. Motion Hearing set for 10/17/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 3, 2014. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
Courtland L. Reichman
McKool Smith Hennigan P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650)-394-1401
Facsimile: (650)-394-1422
creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com
Robert Auchter (PRO HAC VICE)
McKool Smith P.C.
1999 K Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 370-8300
Fax: (202) 370-8344
rauchter@mckoolsmith.com
ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON
SIGNATURE PAGE
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and
ChriMar Holding Company, LLC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al.,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
Cisco Systems Inc., et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
Judge:
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
Magistrate Judge: Maria-Elena James
24
25
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-7, the parties hereby jointly stipulate and request
26
that the Court continue the current hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss Defendants HP and
27
Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP’s Attempted Monopolization
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page2 of 4
1
Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202) filed by Plaintiff ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies
2
and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC’s (collectively, “ChriMar” or “Plaintiff”). This request is
3
supported by good cause and will not affect any other deadlines in this case, as addressed in the
4
attached Declaration of Brandon M. Jordan.
5
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully stipulate and move that the Court enter this
6
stipulation to continue the hearing date from October 3, 2014 to October 17, 2014, as set forth in
7
the attached proposed order.
8
Dated: September 2, 2014
9
Respectfully submitted,
MCKOOL SMITH
10
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
By: /s/ Brandon M. Jordan
11
Robert Auchter (PRO HAC VICE)
Benjamin Levi (PRO HAC VICE)
Dirk Thomas (PRO HAC VICE)
Jeffrey Frey (PRO HAC VICE)
Brandon Jordan (PRO HAC VICE)
MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
1999 K Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 370-8300
Fax: (202) 370-8344
rauchter@mckoolsmith.com
blevi@mckoolsmith.com
dthomas@mckoolsmith.com
jfrey@mckoolsmith.com
bjordan@mckoolsmith.com
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Courtland Reichman
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650)-394-1045
Facsimile: (650)-394-1422
creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com
21
22
23
24
25
Attorney for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems
Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and
ChriMar Holding Company, LLC
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
2
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page3 of 4
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
Dated: September 2, 2014
Michael W. De Vries
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 680-8400
Facsimile: (213) 680-8500
3
4
5
6
Steven Cherny (Pro Hac Vice)
James E. Marina (Pro Hac Vice)
Brian Paul Gearing (Pro Hac Vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 446-4800
Facsimile: (212) 446-4900
7
8
9
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendants
Cisco Systems Inc. and Linksys LLC f/k/a/
Cisco Consumer Products LLC
13
14
By: /s/ Michael W. De Vries
Dated: September 2, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
15
By: /s/ Charles J. Hawkins
16
David H. Dolkas (SBN: 111080 )
Darryl J. Ong (SBN: 286621)
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
ddolkas@mwe.com
djong@mwe.com
Telephone: 650-815-7400
Facsimile: 650-815-7401
17
18
19
20
21
22
Robert J. Walters (Pro Hac Vice)
Charles J. Hawkins (Pro Hac Vice)
Raymond M. Gabriel (Pro Hac Vice)
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
rwalters@mwe.com
chawkins@mwe.com
rgabriel@mwe.com
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
3
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page4 of 4
Telephone: 202-756-8000
Facsimile: 202-756-8087
1
2
Attorneys for Defendant
Hewlett-Packard Co.
3
4
5
6
Pursuant to the Civil Local 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury
7
that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for defendants.
8
9
MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
Dated: September 2, 2014
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
10
/s/ Brandon M. Jordan
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
4
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221-1 Filed09/02/14 Page1 of 2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
OAKLAND DIVISION
4
5
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al.,
6
Plaintiffs,
7
8
v.
Cisco Systems Inc., et al.,
9
Defendants.
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
10
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
DECLARATION OF BRANDON M.
JORDAN IN SUPPORT OF THE
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR
PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET
NO. 202)
Judge:
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
Magistrate Judge: Maria-Elena James
11
12
DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN
13
14
I, Brandon M. Jordan, the undersigned, declare:
15
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia. I am an
16
attorney with the law firm of McKool Smith, P.C., counsel for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc.
17
and ChriMar Holding Company LLC (“ChriMar”) in the above-captioned action.
18
personal knowledge of the matters set forth below and if called and sworn as a witness, I could
19
and would testify competently to the facts set forth herein.
2.
20
I have
The parties believe that there is good cause for the requested continuance as stated
21
in the subsequent paragraphs. The parties have conferred, stipulated, and hereby request that the
22
Court enter their stipulation to continue the hearing date from October 3, 2014, to October 17,
23
2014.
24
3.
Plaintiff ChriMar’s motion to dismiss was originally noticed for a hearing on
25
September 26, 2014.
26
opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and to enlarge time for Plaintiff to file its reply (Dkt.
27
No. 211). While the parties’ previous stipulation did not seek to alter the originally-noticed
28
The parties’ previously stipulated to enlarge time for Defendants’
DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN IN SUPPORT OF
THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221-1 Filed09/02/14 Page2 of 2
1
hearing date of September 26, 2014, on August 26, 2014, the Court issued an order granting the
2
stipulated request, but also modifying the hearing date to October 3, 2014. (See Docket Text
3
accompanying the Court’s Order Granting the parties’ stipulation to enlarge time for Defendants
4
to oppose Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs’ reply at Dkt. No. 220).
5
4.
Plaintiffs request this continuance due to a conflict with the October 3, 2014
6
hearing date. Counsel for ChriMar has a hearing scheduled in Louisville, Kentucky on October
7
2, 2014 in another matter which compromises counsel’s ability to prepare and secure travel for
8
appearance in California the following morning. I have conferred with counsel for the parties in
9
this matter and confirmed that October 17, 2014 is the next available hearing date that does not
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
10
11
conflict with the schedules of the parties’ counsel.
5.
The Court has previously granted a joint motion to extend the deadline to serve
12
initial disclosures (Dkt. No. 124); Cisco’s unopposed motion to extend the deadline for
13
production under Patent L.R. 3-4(a) (Dkt. No. 148); HP’s unopposed motion to extend the
14
deadline for production under Patent L.R. 3-4(a) (Dkt. No. 149); a joint stipulation to extend the
15
deadline for the Patent L.R. 4-2 exchange (Dkt. No. 154); and a joint stipulation to extend the
16
briefing schedule of ChriMar’s Defendants HP and Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200
17
Counterclaims and HP’s Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 220).
18
6.
The requested continuance will not affect any other deadlines in this case.
19
7.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
20
21
Dated: September 2, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
22
23
/s/ Brandon M. Jordan
Brandon M. Jordan
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN IN SUPPORT OF
THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
2
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221-2 Filed09/02/14 Page1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
OAKLAND DIVISION
8
9
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al.,
10
Plaintiffs,
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
11
v.
12
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STIPULATION
TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE
FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION
TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS
(DOCKET NO. 202)
Cisco Systems Inc., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Judge:
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
Magistrate Judge: Maria-Elena James
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
The Court hereby continues the current hearing date for Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss
17
Defendants HP and Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP’s
18
Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202) from October 3, 2014 to October 17,
19
2014 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific time.
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated: September 3, 2014
24
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
25
United States District Court Judge
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202)
Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?