ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 222

ORDER GRANTING 221 Stipulation to Continue Hearing on 202 Motion to Dismiss Defendants HP and Cisco's Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP's Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim. Motion Hearing set for 10/17/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 3, 2014. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)

Download PDF
Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 Courtland L. Reichman McKool Smith Hennigan P.C. 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650)-394-1401 Facsimile: (650)-394-1422 creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com Robert Auchter (PRO HAC VICE) McKool Smith P.C. 1999 K Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 370-8300 Fax: (202) 370-8344 rauchter@mckoolsmith.com ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE Attorneys for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 ChriMar Systems Inc. et al., 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) Cisco Systems Inc., et al., 22 Defendants. 23 Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White Magistrate Judge: Maria-Elena James 24 25 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-7, the parties hereby jointly stipulate and request 26 that the Court continue the current hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss Defendants HP and 27 Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP’s Attempted Monopolization 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page2 of 4 1 Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202) filed by Plaintiff ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies 2 and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC’s (collectively, “ChriMar” or “Plaintiff”). This request is 3 supported by good cause and will not affect any other deadlines in this case, as addressed in the 4 attached Declaration of Brandon M. Jordan. 5 WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully stipulate and move that the Court enter this 6 stipulation to continue the hearing date from October 3, 2014 to October 17, 2014, as set forth in 7 the attached proposed order. 8 Dated: September 2, 2014 9 Respectfully submitted, MCKOOL SMITH 10 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA By: /s/ Brandon M. Jordan 11 Robert Auchter (PRO HAC VICE) Benjamin Levi (PRO HAC VICE) Dirk Thomas (PRO HAC VICE) Jeffrey Frey (PRO HAC VICE) Brandon Jordan (PRO HAC VICE) MCKOOL SMITH P.C. 1999 K Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 370-8300 Fax: (202) 370-8344 rauchter@mckoolsmith.com blevi@mckoolsmith.com dthomas@mckoolsmith.com jfrey@mckoolsmith.com bjordan@mckoolsmith.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Courtland Reichman MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650)-394-1045 Facsimile: (650)-394-1422 creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com 21 22 23 24 25 Attorney for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) 2 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page3 of 4 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 Dated: September 2, 2014 Michael W. De Vries KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 3 4 5 6 Steven Cherny (Pro Hac Vice) James E. Marina (Pro Hac Vice) Brian Paul Gearing (Pro Hac Vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 7 8 9 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendants Cisco Systems Inc. and Linksys LLC f/k/a/ Cisco Consumer Products LLC 13 14 By: /s/ Michael W. De Vries Dated: September 2, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 15 By: /s/ Charles J. Hawkins 16 David H. Dolkas (SBN: 111080 ) Darryl J. Ong (SBN: 286621) MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 ddolkas@mwe.com djong@mwe.com Telephone: 650-815-7400 Facsimile: 650-815-7401 17 18 19 20 21 22 Robert J. Walters (Pro Hac Vice) Charles J. Hawkins (Pro Hac Vice) Raymond M. Gabriel (Pro Hac Vice) MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 500 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 rwalters@mwe.com chawkins@mwe.com rgabriel@mwe.com 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) 3 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221 Filed09/02/14 Page4 of 4 Telephone: 202-756-8000 Facsimile: 202-756-8087 1 2 Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Co. 3 4 5 6 Pursuant to the Civil Local 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury 7 that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for defendants. 8 9 MCKOOL SMITH P.C. Dated: September 2, 2014 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 10 /s/ Brandon M. Jordan 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) 4 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221-1 Filed09/02/14 Page1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 5 ChriMar Systems Inc. et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 8 v. Cisco Systems Inc., et al., 9 Defendants. MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White Magistrate Judge: Maria-Elena James 11 12 DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN 13 14 I, Brandon M. Jordan, the undersigned, declare: 15 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia. I am an 16 attorney with the law firm of McKool Smith, P.C., counsel for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. 17 and ChriMar Holding Company LLC (“ChriMar”) in the above-captioned action. 18 personal knowledge of the matters set forth below and if called and sworn as a witness, I could 19 and would testify competently to the facts set forth herein. 2. 20 I have The parties believe that there is good cause for the requested continuance as stated 21 in the subsequent paragraphs. The parties have conferred, stipulated, and hereby request that the 22 Court enter their stipulation to continue the hearing date from October 3, 2014, to October 17, 23 2014. 24 3. Plaintiff ChriMar’s motion to dismiss was originally noticed for a hearing on 25 September 26, 2014. 26 opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and to enlarge time for Plaintiff to file its reply (Dkt. 27 No. 211). While the parties’ previous stipulation did not seek to alter the originally-noticed 28 The parties’ previously stipulated to enlarge time for Defendants’ DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221-1 Filed09/02/14 Page2 of 2 1 hearing date of September 26, 2014, on August 26, 2014, the Court issued an order granting the 2 stipulated request, but also modifying the hearing date to October 3, 2014. (See Docket Text 3 accompanying the Court’s Order Granting the parties’ stipulation to enlarge time for Defendants 4 to oppose Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs’ reply at Dkt. No. 220). 5 4. Plaintiffs request this continuance due to a conflict with the October 3, 2014 6 hearing date. Counsel for ChriMar has a hearing scheduled in Louisville, Kentucky on October 7 2, 2014 in another matter which compromises counsel’s ability to prepare and secure travel for 8 appearance in California the following morning. I have conferred with counsel for the parties in 9 this matter and confirmed that October 17, 2014 is the next available hearing date that does not MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 10 11 conflict with the schedules of the parties’ counsel. 5. The Court has previously granted a joint motion to extend the deadline to serve 12 initial disclosures (Dkt. No. 124); Cisco’s unopposed motion to extend the deadline for 13 production under Patent L.R. 3-4(a) (Dkt. No. 148); HP’s unopposed motion to extend the 14 deadline for production under Patent L.R. 3-4(a) (Dkt. No. 149); a joint stipulation to extend the 15 deadline for the Patent L.R. 4-2 exchange (Dkt. No. 154); and a joint stipulation to extend the 16 briefing schedule of ChriMar’s Defendants HP and Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 17 Counterclaims and HP’s Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 220). 18 6. The requested continuance will not affect any other deadlines in this case. 19 7. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 20 21 Dated: September 2, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 22 23 /s/ Brandon M. Jordan Brandon M. Jordan 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF BRANDON M. JORDAN IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) 2 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW Case4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document221-2 Filed09/02/14 Page1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 ChriMar Systems Inc. et al., 10 Plaintiffs, MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 11 v. 12 Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) Cisco Systems Inc., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White Magistrate Judge: Maria-Elena James PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 The Court hereby continues the current hearing date for Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss 17 Defendants HP and Cisco’s Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP’s 18 Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202) from October 3, 2014 to October 17, 19 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific time. 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: September 3, 2014 24 Honorable Jeffrey S. White 25 United States District Court Judge 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF CHRIMAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOCKET NO. 202) Case No. 4:13-cv-1300-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?