ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 227

Discovery Order re: Dkt. Nos. 207 , 208 , 217 , 218 . Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/5/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al., Case No. 13-cv-01300-JSW (MEJ) Plaintiffs, 5 DISCOVERY ORDER v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 207, 208, 217, 218 6 7 CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 On September 5, 2014, the Court held a telephonic discovery hearing regarding four pending disputes. As discussed at the hearing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1) Hexagon and Arbor shall produce all agreed-upon documents by October 3, 2014. 12 At the same time, they shall define the limitations they seek for each individual 13 category of requests made by HP that they dispute. 14 2) After production, the parties shall meet and confer in person in an attempt to 15 resolve any of the remaining disputed categories. If still unresolved, they shall 16 appear on October 31, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, for a further meet and 17 confer session. If still unable to resolve all remaining disputes, the parties shall 18 draft a joint letter at the session in compliance with paragraph 2 of the 19 undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order. The parties shall bring any necessary 20 equipment to draft the letter and present it to the Deputy Clerk for electronic filing. 21 3) Hewlett-Packard shall serve written depositions for Steven Dawson and Udi 22 Naamani regarding the matters that they claim were not covered in the depositions 23 taken in the previous ITC litigation. As discussed at the hearing, counsel for HP 24 should be mindful not to include any duplicative topics covered in the previous 25 litigation. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: September 5, 2014 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?