ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 227

Discovery Order re: Dkt. Nos. 207 , 208 , 217 , 218 . Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/5/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-01300-JSW (MEJ)

Plaintiffs,
5

DISCOVERY ORDER

v.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 207, 208, 217, 218

6
7

CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

On September 5, 2014, the Court held a telephonic discovery hearing regarding four
pending disputes. As discussed at the hearing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1)

Hexagon and Arbor shall produce all agreed-upon documents by October 3, 2014.

12

At the same time, they shall define the limitations they seek for each individual

13

category of requests made by HP that they dispute.

14

2)

After production, the parties shall meet and confer in person in an attempt to

15

resolve any of the remaining disputed categories. If still unresolved, they shall

16

appear on October 31, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, for a further meet and

17

confer session. If still unable to resolve all remaining disputes, the parties shall

18

draft a joint letter at the session in compliance with paragraph 2 of the

19

undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order. The parties shall bring any necessary

20

equipment to draft the letter and present it to the Deputy Clerk for electronic filing.

21

3)

Hewlett-Packard shall serve written depositions for Steven Dawson and Udi

22

Naamani regarding the matters that they claim were not covered in the depositions

23

taken in the previous ITC litigation. As discussed at the hearing, counsel for HP

24

should be mindful not to include any duplicative topics covered in the previous

25

litigation.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: September 5, 2014

______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge